Skip to main content
. 2021 May 3;8(2):e000891. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000891

Table 1.

Confirmed objective response per independent radiology review committee in intermediate-risk/poor-risk patients, the ITT population, and in favorable-risk patients

Response assessment IMDC
intermediate risk/poor risk
ITT population IMDC favorable risk
NIVO+IPI
(N=425)
SUN
(N=422)
NIVO+IPI
(N=550)
SUN
(N=546)
NIVO+IPI
(N=125)
SUN
(N=124)
Objective response rate, % (95% CI) 42.1 (37.4–47.0) 26.3 (22.2–30.8) 39.1 (35.0–43.3) 32.6 (28.7–36.7) 28.8 (21.1–37.6) 54.0 (44.9–63.0)
     p<0.0001      p=0.0190      p<0.0001
Best overall response, %
 Complete response 10.1 1.4 10.7 2.4 12.8 5.6
 Partial response 32.0 24.9 28.4 30.2 16.0 48.4
 Stable disease 30.6 44.3 35.8 41.6 53.6 32.3
 Progressive disease 19.8 17.3 18.2 14.5 12.8 4.8
 Unable to determine/not reported 7.5 12.1 6.9 11.4 4.8 8.9
Median time to response (IQR), months N=179
2.8 (2.7–3.3)
N=111
3.6 (2.8–5.6)
N=215
2.8 (2.7–4.0)
N=178
4.0 (2.8–5.8)
N=36
2.8 (2.7–4.3)
N=67
4.2 (2.8–7.2)
Ongoing response, n (%) 121 (67.6) 58 (52.3) 146 (67.9) 94 (52.8) 25 (69.4) 36 (53.7)
Ongoing response in complete responders, n (%) N=43
36 (83.7)
N=6
6 (100.0)
N=59
51 (86.4)
N=13
12 (92.3)
N=16
15 (93.8)
N=7
6 (85.7)
Ongoing response in partial responders, n (%) N=136
85 (62.5)
N=105
52 (49.5)
N=156
95 (60.9)
N=165
82 (49.7)
N=20
10 (50.0)
N=60
30 (50.0)

IMDC, International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium; IQR, interquartile range; ITT, intention-to-treat; NIVO+IPI, nivolumab plus ipilimumab; SUN, sunitinib.