Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 14;24:434. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03114-y

Table 2.

Comparison of microbiological documentation obtained by conventional techniques versus rm-PCR in 159 pneumonia episodes

Pathogen identification Conventional techniques rm-PCR
Targets included in the rm-PCR panel
 Gram-negative bacilli
Escherichia coli 24 33
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 23 28
Enterobacter cloacae complex 13 22
Klebsiella pneumoniae group 13 14
Haemophilus influenzae 11 33
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex 3 4
Enterobacter aerogenes 5 7
Serratia marcescens 3 5
Proteus spp. 2 8
Moraxella catarrhalis 1 5
Klebsiella oxytoca 1 5
 Gram-positive cocci
Staphylococcus aureus 26 42
Streptococcus pneumoniae 8 16
Streptococcus pyogenes 0 0
Streptococcus agalactiae 0 0
 Atypical bacteria
Legionella pneumophila 1 1
Mycoplasma pneumoniae 0 1
Chlamydophila pneumoniae 0 0
 Resistance
  mecA 5
  CTX-M 11
Targets not included in the rm-PCR panel
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 4
Morganella morganii 3
Raoultella ornithinolytica 3
Citrobacter sp. 4
Hafnia 1
 Others* 11

Conventional techniques include culture for all pathogens presented, apart from Legionella pneumophila which was detected using molecular techniques

rm-PCR real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction

*Acinetobacter junii (n = 1), Actinomyces odontolyticus (n = 1), Corynebacterium sp. (n = 1), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (n = 4), Enterococcus faecium (n = 1), Enterococcus faecalis (n = 6), Lactobacillus reuteri (n = 1), Streptococcus alpha (n = 1), Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae (n = 1)