Table 3.
Responses to open question on ethical concerns of companion robot use with older people (%) (Q5)
| Response | N (%) | Examples | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concern | 20 (30) | Concern | N | |
| Batteries | 2 | “Emotional distress if the batteries ran out” | ||
| Malfunction | 1 | “What happens if they malfunction?” | ||
| Human Contact | 7 | “Might encourage people to be distant from the elderly” | ||
| Robustness | 1 | “Toughness, can they withstand a fall?” | ||
| Deception | 4 | “They could become confused as to whether the robot was real or not” | ||
| Privacy | 1 | “Should not be connected to net (privacy)” | ||
| Danger | 2 | “Tripping/falling” | ||
| Dignity | 2 | “They may try to feed or walk them, potential embarrassment” | ||
| Infantilisation | 1 | “May feel patronised, belittled with a fluffy toy” | ||
| No Concern | 40 (60) | “No” “None” “No, it seems very safe” | ||
| Unsure | 2 (3) | “I don’t know” “Not sure” | ||
| No Response | 5 (7) | |||