Table 3.
State-wise results of the survey among participants who dropped out of the course
| Reasons for quitting (n = 69) | Suggestions to improve the retention (n = 69) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State | Busy at work | Not interested | Unable to understand the subject matter | Other | Network Issue | Total | Change of time | Change in the manner the didactic is delivered | Change in the format of the course | Less number of sessions | Module-wise courses for each type of cancers: cervical, breast and oral | Other | Total |
| Bihar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Chandigarh | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Chhattisgarh | 19 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 21 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 21 |
| Daman & Diu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Goa | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gujarat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jharkhand | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Manipur | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Orissa | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sikkim | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tamil Nadu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tripura | 19 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 30 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 30 |
| Uttar Pradesh | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| West Bengal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 52 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 69 | 44 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 69 |