Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Autism Res. 2019 Oct 17;13(2):271–283. doi: 10.1002/aur.2225

Table 3.

Model Results for Manual Gaze Coding

Estimate SE t value p value
(Intercept) 0.228 0.045 5.098 < .001*
ot1 0.652 0.211 3.089 .002*
ot2 −0.485 0.164 −2.952 .003*
ot3 −0.189 0.089 −2.130 .033*
Condition −0.241 0.961 −2.511 .012*
ot1:Condition −0.428 0.424 −1.010 .313
ot2:Condition 0.780 0.311 2.505 .012*
ot3:Condition −0.041 0.177 −0.231 .818

Note. The independent variable was Time and the dependent variable was the log odds of looking to the target image. ot1 = linear time. ot2 = quadratic time. ot3 = cubic time. Condition (Target Present vs. Target Absent) was contrast coded using −0.5 and 0.5.

*

indicates significance at p < .05.