Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: Emotion. 2010 Dec;10(6):874–893. doi: 10.1037/a0020019

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

In-group advantages in Experiments 1 and 2. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Significantly different with Scheffé correction and αFW = .05. (a) Culture × Expression Style interaction in Experiment 1. Japanese participants exhibit an in-group advantage on Japanese expressions, and U.S. participants exhibit an in-group advantage on American expressions. (b) The reciprocal in-group advantage is not found in an equivalent analysis by poser race. Japanese and U.S. participants are equally accurate on expressions of Japanese posers; U.S. participants exhibit an advantage over Japanese participants on expressions of Caucasian posers. (c) Culture × Expression style interaction in Experiment 2. Model participants exhibit the same reciprocal in-group advantages shown in (a).