(a) Heatmaps showing trial-averaged response to 20, 1 s laser pulses in presumptive Arch+/Jaws+ (top) and Arch-/Jaws- (bottom). Arch or Jaws-expressing cells show rapid onset and deep suppression during exposure to 532 nm or 640 nm light, respectively. (b) Two criteria were applied to identify Arch+/Jaws+ cells: 1) p<0.0001 in rank-sum test of spiking in the 1 s preceding and during laser stimulation, 2) median last-spike latency during laser pulse <0.01 ms (shown as red dots). Additionally, cells with overall firing rates < 0.175 Hz or a peak-trough time <0.35 ms in their average waveform were excluded from classification either as Arch+/Jaws+ or Arch-/Jaws- cells. Arch+/Jaws+ cells (red dots circled in red) identified with these criteria were subtly shifted toward more superficial recording locations compared to the total recorded population. (c) Two experiments (out of 12) used excitation with ChR2 for opto-tagging. Heatmaps show trial-averaged responses for all recorded cells to ~200, 1 ms pulses of 473 nm light, delivered at 4 Hz. Cells are sorted within heatmap by estimated DV position. ChR2+ cells show rapid and reliable stimulus-locked spiking. (d) Two criteria were applied to identify ChR2+ cells: (1) p-value<0.001 in Stimulus-Associated spike Latency Test (see Materials and methods), (2) latency-to-peak response in PSTH <0.003 ms. Cells with a peak-trough time <0.35 in their average waveform were excluded from classification as ChR2+ or ChR2-. ChR2+ cells (red dots circled in red) tended toward more superficial recording locations compared to the total recorded population.