Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 13;11(4):989–1001. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa015

TABLE 1.

Muscle mass, strength, and function outcomes with protein or free amino acid interventions during experimental disuse1

Study Model and duration Age, y Nutrition intervention Muscle mass Strength and function Effect
Holloway et al. 2019 (57) 7 d leg immobilization Young adults ∼66.8 g/d of proprietary amino acid–containing formulation on top of 1.0 g · kg−1 · d−1 dietary protein 2.4% ↓ volume and 3.1% ↓ CSA of quadriceps in control group, no change with intervention Similar reductions in peak leg isometric torque Yes
Arentson-Lantz et al. 2019 (58) 7 d bed rest ∼69 Mixed macronutrient diet vs. isoenergetic, whey-augmented, higher-protein-quality diet 1035 vs. −680 ± 138 g ↓ leg lean mass, control vs. intervention, (P = 0.08) 20% ↓ knee extensor peak torque both groups Yes
Backx et al. 2018 (61) 7 d leg immobilization ∼22 7.5 g leucine/d (2.5 g leucine/meal) 6% ↓ quadriceps CSA both groups 9% ↓ leg extension 1-RM both groups No
Mitchell et al. 2018 (59) 14 d leg immobilization ∼50 20 g/d high-quality dairy protein with morning meal 4.1% ↓ thigh muscle CSA both groups 24.7% ↓ knee extension torque both groups No
English et al. 2016 (6) 14 d bed rest ∼52 13.2 g leucine/d (4.4 g leucine/meal) 1.5 kg ↓ whole-body lean mass after 7 d in control group and no change with intervention; similar decrease after 14 d 15% vs. 7% ↓ knee extensor peak torque, 14% vs. 2% ↓ knee extensor endurance, 9% vs. 1% ↓ muscle quality, control vs. intervention, (P < 0.05) Yes
Dirks et al. 2014 (60) 5 d leg immobilization ∼69 20 g/d leucine-enriched whey protein supplement directly after breakfast and before sleep Similar reductions in quadriceps CSA Similar reductions in leg extension 1-RM No
Deutz et al. 2013 (56) 10 d bed rest ∼67 1.5 g Ca-HMB, 4 g maltodextrin, 200 mg calcium, and sweetener twice daily 2.05 kg ↓ whole-body lean mass in control group, no change with intervention No change in isokinetic knee extensor strength in either group Yes
Ferrando et al. 2010 (5) 10 d bed rest ∼69 15 g EAAs 3 times/d Similar reductions in total and leg lean mass 51% vs. 13% ↑floor transfer time, control vs. intervention, (P < 0.05) Yes
Trappe et al. 2007 (62) 60 d bed rest ∼32 1.0 vs. 1.6 g protein · kg−1 · d−1 (3.6 g leucine, 1.8 g valine, 1.8 g isoleucine supplement per day) 21% vs. 24% ↓ quadriceps muscle volume, control vs. intervention, (P < 0.05) Similar reductions in supine squat strength No
Paddon-Jones et al. 2004 (55) 28 d bed rest ∼37 16.5 g EAAs plus 30 g sucrose 3 times/d 0.4 kg ↓ leg lean mass in control group, no change with intervention 17.8 vs. 8.8 kg ↓ single-leg, leg extension 1-RM, control vs. intervention, (P < 0.05) Yes
1

CSA, cross-sectional area; EAA, essential amino acid; HMB, β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate; 1-RM, 1-repetition maximum. ↑ indicates increase and ↓ indicates decrease.