Table 2.
State | County | Unmet child care needs (%) | ω | CE (%) | Diabetes (%) | Rural (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AL | Conecuh | 13.2 (13.1, 13.3) | 2.24 | 7.3 | 20 | 81 |
CA | Fresno | 12.9 (12.9, 12.9) | 3.13 | 9.4 | 10 | 11 |
CA | San Francisco | 3.7 (3.7, 3.7) | 0.47 | 6.8 | 8 | 0 |
NY | Bronx | 11.2 (11.2, 11.2) | 0.75 | 9.2 | 13 | 0 |
SD | Todd | 19 (18.8, 19.2) | 2.93 | 7.6 | 15 | 100 |
TX | Hidalgo | 16.8 (16.7, 16.8) | 2.52 | 9.7 | 10 | 5 |
Closure effectiveness is defined as the percent reduction in peak hospital bed demand when R0=2. A constant R0 is used as an adjustment measure to illustrate comparisons of closure effectiveness between counties strictly based on demographics and not levels of social contact