Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Dent Assoc. 2020 Jul;151(7):480–490.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.03.040

Table 1 –

Summary data on sample characteristics.

Children aged 8 to 10 Teens aged 11 to 14
Total number of subjects 56 82
 Female – n (%) 34 (61) 51 (62)
Age – mean ±SD 9.4 ±0.9 13.2 ±1.2
Race (White) – n (%) 43 (77) 67 (82)
 others – n (%) 13 (23) 15 (18)
Bisphosphonate (Yes) – n (%) 41 (73) 59 (72)
OI Type
 Type I – n (%) 26 (46) 39 (48)
 Type III – n (%) 16 (29) 14 (17)
 Type IV – n (%) 11 (20) 23 (28)
 Others – n (%) 3 (5) 6 (7)
Family history of having OI (Yes) – n (%) 27 (48) 34 (41)
DI (Yes) – n (%) 22 (39) 25 (30)
Posterior Open-bite (Yes) – n (%) 14 (25) 25 (30)
Anterior Open-bite (Yes) – n (%) 7 (12) 6 (7)
 Missing – n (%) 10 (18) 10 (12)
Posterior Crossbite (Yes) – n (%) 20 (36) 30 (37)
Anterior Crossbite (Yes) – n (%) 21 (38) 30 (37)
Angle’s Classification
 Cl I – n (%) 15 (27) 30 (37)
 Cl II – n (%) 9 (16) 13 (16)
 Cl III – n (%) 32 (57) 37 (45)
 Neglected – n (%) 0 (0) 2 (2)

OI, Osteogenesis Imperfecta, DI, Dentinogenesis Imperfecta.