Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 8;7:329. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00329

Table 1.

Percentage of farms reporting the use of different antimicrobial active ingredients by animal species (in 39 poultry farms and 54 swine farms).

Antimicrobial class Antimicrobial active ingredient Poultry farms n (%) Swine farms n (%)
Aminoglycosides Apramycin 0 (0%) 1 (2%)
Gentamicin 0 (0%) 7 (13%)*
Neomycin 0 (0%) 1 (2%)
Streptomycin 2 (5%) 2 (4%)
Cephalosporins Ceftiofur 0 (0%) 2 (4%)
Cephalexin 0 (0%) 1 (2%)
Fluoroquinolones Ciprofloxacin 0 (0%) 1 (2%)
Danofloxacin 0 (0%) 1 (2%)
Enrofloxacin 13 (33%) 19 (36%)
Levofloxacin 1 (3%) 0 (0%)
Norfloxacin 10 (25%) 3 (6%)*
Lincosamides and aminocyclitols Lincomycin 0 (0%) 3 (6%)
Lincomycin-spectinomycin 0 (0%) 1 (2%)
Macrolides Erythromycin 3 (8%) 0 (0%)*
Kitasamycin 1 (3%) 0 (0%)
Tilmicosin 2 (5%) 4 (8%)
Tulathromycin 0 (0%) 1 (2%)
Tylosin 3 (8%) 14 (25%)*
Penicillins Amoxicillin 8 (20%) 11 (21%)
Penicillin 1 (3%) 1 (2%)
Phenicols Florfenicol 4 (10%) 5 (9%)
Thiamphenicol 1 (3%) 0 (0%)
Phosphonic acid derivatives Fosfomycin 4 (10%) (0%)*
Pleuromutilins Tiamulin 0 (0%) 12 (23%)*
Polypeptides Colistin 5 (13%) 6 (11%)
Tetraycyclines Chlortetracycline 0 (0%) 2 (4%)
Doxycycline 6 (15%) 11 (21%)
Oxytetracycline 4 (10%) 16 (30%)*
Trimethoprim and sulfonamides Trimethoprim-sulfadiazine 5 (13%) 2 (4%)
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 2 (5%) 0 (0%)
*

Significant differences between poultry and swine farms (P ≤ 0.05), Fisher exact test (represented in bold fonts).