Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 4;2(4):100134. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100134

Table 1.

Randomised controlled trial comparing liver resection with radiofrequency ablation.

Study Characteristics of the study Characteristics of the patients Endpoints Morbidity/mortality
Lee et al.
Ann Surg Treat Res 201828
Korea
2005–2008
RCT
29 LR vs. 34 RFA
% cirrhosis n.d.
% viral hepatitis n.d.
100% solitary tumour
24% HCC between 3–4 cm
OS at 3 years:
96.6% in LR vs. 97.1% in RFA (p = n.s.)
DFS at 3 years:
66.7% in LR vs. 44.1% in RFA (p = 0.071)
37.9% in LR vs. 26.5% in RFA (p = n.s.)
Deaths 3.4% in LR vs. 0% in RFA
Ng et al.
BJS 201729
China
2002–2007
RCT
109 LR vs. 109 RFA
% cirrhosis n.d.
90% viral hepatitis
91% solitary tumour
100% In Milan criteria
OS at 3 years:
80.6% in LR vs. 82.3% in RFA (p = n.s.)
DFS at 3 years:
50.9% in LR vs. 46.6% in RFA (p = n.s.)
16.5% in LR vs. 9.2% in RFA (p = n.s.)
Deaths 0.9% in LR vs. 0% in RFA
Fang et al.
JGHF 201430
China
2000–2012
60 LR vs. 60 RFA
80% cirrhosis
90% viral hepatitis
80% solitary tumour
100% HCC ≤3 cm
OS at 3 years:
77.5% in LR vs. 82.5% in RFA (p = n.s.)
DFS at 3 years:
41.3% in LR vs. 55.4.1% in RFA (p = n.s.)
27.5% in LR vs. 5% in RFA (p <0.05)
No deaths
Feng et al.
J Hepatol 201231
China
2005–2008
RCT
84 LR vs. 84 RFA
60% cirrhosis
84% viral hepatitis
60% solitary tumour
64% HCC between 2–4 cm
OS at 3 years:
74.8% in LR vs. 67.2% in RFA (p = n.s.)
Recurrence at 3 years:
37.7% in LR vs. 49.6% in RFA (p = n.s.)
21.4% in LR vs. 9.5% in RFA (p <0.05)
No deaths
Huang et al.
Ann Surg 201032
China
2003–2005
RCT
115 LR vs. 115 RFA
70% cirrhosis
93% viral hepatitis
55% solitary tumour
50 % HCC between 3–5 cm
More solitary tumour in LR
Larger HCC in RFA group
OS at 3 years:
92% in LR vs. 76% in RFA (p = 0.001)
Recurrence at 3 years:
34% in LR vs. 49% in RFA (p = 0.024)
28% in LR vs. 4% in RFA (p <0.05)
No deaths
Cheng et al.
Ann Surg 200633
China
1999–2004
RCT
90 LR vs. 90 RFA
% cirrhosis n.d.
% viral hepatitis n.d.
100% solitary tumour
50 % HCC between 3–5 cm
OS at 3 years:
73% in LR vs. 69% in RFA (p = n.s.)
DFS at 3 years:
52% in LR vs. 60% in RFA (p = n.s.)
55% in LR vs. 4% in RFA (p <0.05)
Deaths 1.1% in LR vs. 0% in RFA
Lu et al.
ZhonghuA Yi Xue Za Zhi 200634
China
RCT
Written in Chinese
54 LR vs. 51 RFA
% cirrhosis n.d.
% viral hepatitis n.d.
% solitary tumour n.d.
100% In Milan criteria
OS at 3 years:
86.4% in LR vs. 87.1% in RFA (p = n.s.)
DFS at 3 years:
82.4% in LR vs. 51.3% in RFA (p = n.s.)
11.1% in LR vs. 7.8% in RFA (p = n.s.)
% n.s. Deaths

DFS, disease-free survival; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LR, liver resection, OS, overall survival; n.d., not determined, n.s., not significant; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; RCT, randomised controlled trial.