TABLE 5.
First author | Title | Patient characteristics | Recommendation | The reason | Dose adjustment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rademaker, M. |
Advice regarding COVID‐19 and use of immunomodulators, in patients with severe dermatological diseases 46 |
Patient With inflammatory skin disorder being actively managed with an immunomodulator who confirmed COVID‐19 Disease | should stop the immunomodulator (s) immediately, exception of systemic corticosteroids | COVID‐19 infection being aggravated by immunomodulators and secondary bacterial infection as part of COVID‐19 complication become aggravated too | Not reported |
patient with inflammatory skin disorder being actively managed with an immunomodulator who with signs of common cold but is not formally diagnosed with COVID‐19 disease |
Lowering the dose of immunomodulatory/ or temporarily stopping for 2 weeks. Exception is systemic corticosteroids. |
|
|||
Federico Bardazzi |
Biologic therapy for psoriasis during the COVID‐19 outbreak is not a choice 47 | patient is stable or in good health | It is not reasonable/indicated to suspend the ongoing immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory therapy | as the risk of reactivation of the underlying pathology could add an additional risk factor to infections, including COVID‐19./inhibition of IL‐17 pathway may have beneficial effects in treating COVID‐19 | Not reported |
Shanshal, M. |
Biological treatment uses amid the COVID‐19 era, a close look at the unresolved perplexity 48 |
patients who are already on biological treatment and have tested positive for COVID‐19 | Discontinuing or postponing the biological therapy until full recovery from the COVID‐19 infection. |
patients with existing comorbidities will need extra precaution along with frequent clinical observation and monitoring, some patients with active infection show no symptoms or radiologic abnormalities in the initial presentation and might not realize that they have been infected |
Not reported |
composed of patients who are being considered for the initiation of biological therapy | avoidance of initiation of biologic therapy for high‐risk patients | Not reported | |||
patients with severe psoriasis, those on potentially immunosuppressive therapies, and those presenting comorbid conditions might be at higher risk of infection. | all individuals stop biological treatment as soon as they are diagnosed with COVID‐19 infection | Not reported | |||
Di Lernia, Vito | Biologics for psoriasis during COVID‐19 outbreak 49 | patients on biologics and on immunosuppressants for psoriasis, hidradenitis, atopic dermatitis, pemphigoid, pemphigus, and other conditions | all patients taking biologics wear such coverings or masks when outside the home and practice social distancing | it is neither practical nor logical to cease these over a few weeks while this pandemic is upon us | Not reported |
Megna, M. |
Biologics for psoriasis patients in the COVID‐19 era: more evidence, less fears 50 |
psoriasis patients during COVID‐19 pandemic era |
We strongly believe that proactive biologic discontinuation should be avoided. |
interruption of biologic therapy in psoriatic patients involves a dysregulation of inflammatory cytokines that not only exacerbates psoriasis but is also likely to contribute to a more aggressive organic response to SARS‐CoV‐2, biologics for psoriasis do not increase the risk of viral infections or their complications | Not reported |
Abdelmaksoud, A. |
Comment on “COVID‐19 and psoriasis: Is it time to limit treatment with immunosuppressants? A call for action” 51 |
Older patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriatic | Not stop systemic biologic or nonbiologic therapy and phototherapy/ interleukin 17 inhibitors should considered in the priority because have lower effects on personal immune functions | users of apremilast, etanercept, and ustekinumab are at lower risk rate of serious infection compared with those on methotrexate, | Not reported |
Conforti, C. |
COVID‐19 and psoriasis: Is it time to limit treatment with immunosuppressants? A call for action 52 |
patient with psoriasis taking immunosuppressive drugs | limit and/or reduce the time of administration, preferring topical and/or drugs with a lower impact on the immune system | these drugs may cause decreased immune response and greater susceptibility to life‐threatening infections | Not reported |
patient with psoriasis taking immunosuppressive drugs who confirmed COVID‐19 | stop all immunosuppressive and biological therapy | Not reported | |||
Price, K. N. | COVID‐19 and immunomodulator/immunosuppressant use in dermatology 53 | Psoriasis Patients treat with Corticosteroids, Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine, Mycophenolate mofetil, Azathioprine, Methotrexate | Consider stopping when viral symptoms present especially with known or potential exposure | Broad immunosuppression across multiple cytokine axes with immunosuppressants has the potential to increase susceptibility, persistence, and reactivation of viral infections. Immunosuppressants decrease cytokines that recruit and differentiate immune cells needed to clear the infection. In addition, inflammatory mediators can become hyperactivated, resulting in a “cytokine storm,” which is the primary cause of death in severe disease. |
Not reported |
psoriasis Patients treat with Infliximab, Etanercept, Certolizumab, Adalimumab, Anakinra (IL‐1) | Continue if viral symptoms are mild, consider stopping if viral symptoms worsen or high fever develops | Not reported | |||
psoriasis Patients treat with Dupilumab (IL‐4) | Continue unless severe symptoms present | Not reported | |||
psoriasis Patients treat with Brodalumab (IL‐17), Secukinumab (IL‐17a), Ixekizumab (IL‐17a), Ustekinumab (IL‐12/23), Guselkumab (IL‐23) | Continue if viral symptoms are mild, consider stopping if viral symptoms worsen or high fever develops | Not reported | |||
psoriasis Patients treat with Rituximab | Consider stopping when viral symptoms present especially with known or potential exposure. | Not reported | |||
psoriasis Patients treat with Apremilast | Continue unless severe symptoms present | Not reported | |||
Wang, C. | COVID‐19 and the use of immunomodulatory and biologic agents for severe cutaneous disease: An Australia/New Zealand consensus statement 54 | Patients on immunomodulators, including biologic agents and new small molecular inhibitors for cutaneous disease, with suspected or confirmed COVID‐19 disease | All immunomodulators used for skin diseases should be immediately withheld, exception of systemic corticosteroid therapy, | immunosuppression is thought to increase susceptibility and cause more severe infection and atypical presentations of coronavirus infections in immunocompromised hosts, including prolonged incubation periods, persistent asymptomatic viral shedding, diarrh oea, weight loss and encephalitis as primary manifestations |
|
on immunomodulators, who develop symptoms or signs of an upper respiratory tract infection, but COVID‐19 is not yet confirmed | dose reduction or temporarily cessation for 1–2 weeks |
there is currently insufficient evidence to suggest that COVID ‐19 infection is aggravated by immunomodulators used in skin disease, however all COVID‐19 infections should be considered serious |
|
||
Well patients on immunomodulators | Immunomodulators and biologics should be continued |
Discontinuation of biologic therapy may result in a loss of treatment response when rechallenged and/or development of drug antibodies |
Not reported | ||
Children patients on immunomodulators, | Dose reduction or cessation of immunomodulators and biologics is not necessary | Not reported | Not reported | ||
Organ Transplant/Bone marrow transplant patients | Immunosuppressive treatments (eg, prednisone, ciclosporin, tacrolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate, etc.) should not be stopped | Not reported | Not reported | ||
Arora, G | The COVID‐19 outbreak and rheumatologic skin diseases 55 | Patients on Disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMRD)s, biologics or other immunosuppressive medications | Required to consult their rheumatologist and stop these drugs during an infection | Because patients with rheumatic disease are more susceptible to the COVID‐19 virus either because of the rheumatalogic disease itself or the medications used to treat their underlying disease. | Not reported |
Non‐infected patients | Advised to continue their medication during the epidemic | ||||
Kansal, NK | COVID‐19, syphilis, and biologic therapies for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: A word of caution 56 | Patients with psoriasis and psoriasis arthritis | Considering the risk to benefit ratio before discontinuing drugs and monitoring the patients who continue to receive the therapy | Because the prognosis of COVID‐19 cannot be predicted in individual cases (particularly in middle aged and older patients, with co‐morbidities like diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular disease etc, if they are being treated with biologics). | Not reported |
Plachouri, KM | The management of biologics in dermatologic patients in the 2019‐nCoV era 57 | Dermatologic patients | Postpone initiation of biologic treatments in this particular period | The lack of sufficient data concerning the interaction of SARS‐CoV‐2 and biologics is also an important factor that should be taken into consideration when examining the option of initiating therapy with the latter. Another logistic parameter that should not be underestimated is the need of frequent careful monitoring under such treatments that includes both regular laboratory examinations as well as routine dermatologic follow‐up visits, which could constitute a problem under the emerging societal circulatory restrictions that are posed in order to control the pandemic transmission | Not reported |
Brownstone, ND | Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID‐19) and Biologic Therapy in Psoriasis: Infection Risk and Patient Counseling in Uncertain Times 58 | Psoriatic patients with following risk factors:
|
favoring biologic discontinuation or reduction in immunomodulatory regimen, if reduction is needed option include:
|
These recommendations are based on rate of infections in previous clinical trials studies about biologic and immunosuppressive drugs in psoriatic patients | Not reported |
Psoriatic patients with following risk factors:
|
favoring biologic continuation | Not reported | |||
Patients who test positive for COVID‐19 infection | Advising to hold their biologic dose until their infection clears. | This requires untill improvement in respiratory symptoms, and two negative COVID‐19 test performed 24 hours apart. if COVID‐19 retesting is not available, restarting biologic therapy until 30 days after resolution of fever and respiratory symptoms | |||
Villani, A | Patients with advanced basal cell carcinomas in treatment with sonic hedgehog inhibitors during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) period: Management and adherence to treatment 59 | Patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma receiving treatment with the hedgehog pathway inhibitors sonidegib and vismodegib during the COVID‐19 period | Continuing therapy. Dose adjustment to prolong treatment duration, when possible. | Based on their analysis on 37 patients at Italian referral center for skin cancer diagnosis and management | Not reported |
Gisondi, P | Risk of hospitalization and death from COVID‐19 infection in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis receiving a biological treatment and renal transplanted recipients in maintenance immunosuppressive treatment 60 | Patients with chronic plaque psoriasis receiving a biological treatment and renal transplanted recipients in maintenance immunosuppressive treatment | There is no need to discontinue their therapies | There is no early signal of an increased hospitalization or death from COVID‐19. Based on retrospective observational study in verona | Not reported |
ShakShouk, H | Treatment considerations for patients with pemphigus during the COVID‐19 pandemic 61 | Patients with pemphigus and without active infection | postponing rituximab infusions temporarily | Delaying peak patient immunosuppression during peak COVID‐19 incidence to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes. | Not reported |
glucocorticoids and steroid‐sparing immunosuppressive agents, such as azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, should be tapered to the lowest effective dose | Their nonspecific immunosuppressive effects increase infection risk, among other complications, in a dose‐dependent manner. | Not reported | |||
Patients with pemphigus and active COVID‐19 infection | postponing rituximab infusions temporarily | Delaying peak patient immunosuppression during peak COVID‐19 incidence to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes. | Not reported | ||
In active COVID‐19 infection, immunosuppressive steroid‐ sparing medications should be discontinued when possible | Their nonspecific immunosuppressive effects increase infection risk, among other complications, in a dose‐dependent manner. | Not reported | |||
Jic ZA |
United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium Recommendations for Treatment of Cutaneous Lymphomas During the COVID‐19 Pandemic 62 |
Low risk patients with cutaneous lymphomas | Low‐risk therapies that can be utilized at home should be continued for all patients. Home‐based NBUVB and heliotherapy can be continued or initiated. | The risks of travel and exposure likely outweigh the benefit of in‐office treatments such as ultraviolet light therapy and total body electron beam radiation therapy. | Not reported |
Intermediate low risk patients with cutaneous lymphomas | Therapies may be continued, but dose adjustments may be advised on an individual basis. Initiation of these therapies may be postponed using low‐risk bridge therapies short term. Increasing or initiation of a retinoid or interferon should be considered in cases that necessitate the removal of other high‐risk therapies. | Not reported | Not reported | ||
Intermediate high risk patients with cutaneous lymphomas | Not reported | ||||
High risk patients with cutaneous lymphomas | May require travel to the clinic or hospital. These should only be utilized in the highest risk patients and the additional risks of therapy‐related travel should be considered. Infusion regimens may be adjusted to increase treatment intervals. Allogeneic stem cell transplant and treatment with CHOP, alemtuzumab, fludarabine are strongly discouraged, Consider alternative lower risk therapies whenever possible. | Allogeneic stem cell transplant and treatment with CHOP, alemtuzumab, fludarabine are strongly discouraged during the pandemic because they often lead to significant cytopenias that are known risk factors for COVID‐19 complications. | Romidepsin and mogamulizumab may be considered on individual basis with extended intervals and lower doses. | ||
Torres, T | Managing Cutaneous Immune‐Mediated Diseases During the COVID‐19 Pandemic 63 | patients with cutaneous immune‐mediated diseases (including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and hidradenitis suppurativa) and without active COVID‐19 infection | Continue their treatment even during the COVID‐19 outbreak |
|
Not reported |
Patients with cutaneous immune‐mediated diseases (including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and hidradenitis suppurativa) and with active COVID‐19 infection | Withhold immunosuppressive or biologic treatment | Not reported | Not reported | ||
Megna, M | Biologics for psoriasis in COVID‐19 era: what do we know? 64 | Psoriatic patients without COVID‐19 infection | Treatment discontinuation should be avoided | Unnecessary biologic discontinuation would lead to a worsening of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in a high percentage of the cases. As a consequence, there may be higher disease burden, destructive impact on quality of life, as well as increased health care costs due to the augmented number of consultations and recovery. Furthermore, the unavoidable subsequent return to biologic therapy could be associated with switching toward higher cost drugs, due to the well‐known lower efficacy of biologics in the same patient after their interruption | Not reported |
Psoriatic patients with COVID‐19 infection | Treatment discontinuation | Not reported | |||
Amerio, P | COVID‐19 and psoriasis: should we fear for patients treated with biologics 65 | Psoriatic patients | The treatment of psoriatic patients with biologicals should not be discontinued during the time of this pandemic | Based on literature review | Not reported |
elderly patients with coexisting morbidities such as hypertension, diabetes and obesity that enhance their chance of developing, if ever infected, a more severe disease; when patients develop flu like or COVID‐19 specific (anosmia, asthenia) symptoms and if are exposed to high risk contact with infected people | Suspend the treatment should be made | Not reported |