Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 2;127(10):1229–1240. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16381

Table 1.

Participants' anxiety status

City Total (n = 1947) t2 P‐value
Wuhan (n = 932) Chongqing (n = 1015)
Standard score * 43.97 ± 8.71 40.37 ± 7.15 42.09 ± 8.13** 9.9150 <0.0001
42.50 (11.25) 40.00 (10.00) 41.25 (10.00)
Degree of anxiety ***
No 704 (75.54) 909 (89.56) 1613 (82.85) 69.9681 <0.0001
Mild 175 (18.78) 95 (9.36) 270 (13.87)
Moderate or severe 53 (5.69) 11 (1.08) 64 (3.29)

Comparations were conducted across the two cities.

a

Data are mean ± SD or median (IQR). Student's t‐test was used.

b

The Cohen's d for the SAS standard score was indicative of small‐to‐medium effect: 0.44.

c

Data are n (%). Kruskal–Wallis test was used.