Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 2;127(10):1229–1240. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16381

Table 3.

Participants' obstetric decisions

City Total χ2 P‐value
Wuhan Chongqing
Request of online consultation * n = 932 n = 1015 n = 1947 8.6528 0.0033
Yes 703 (75.43) 705 (69.46) 1408 (72.32)
No 229 (24.57) 310 (30.54) 539 (27.68)
Hospital preference ** n = 932 n = 1015 n = 1947
Refuse to go to any hospital 390 (41.85) 281 (27.68) 671 (34.46) 43.1368 <0.0001
Previous hospital of prenatal care 319 (34.23) 713 (70.25) 1032 (53.00) 253.0501 <0.0001
Hospital closer to home 147 (15.77) 122 (12.02) 269 (13.82) 5.7467 0.0165
Large comprehensive hospital 36 (3.86) 107 (10.54) 143 (7.34) 31.8512 <0.0001
Specialized hospital of Obstetrics 420 (45.06) 145 (14.29) 565 (29.02) 223.4554 <0.0001
Prenatal care (plan, reason/way) ** n = 499 n = 796 n = 1295
Postponed, inconvenience 461 (92.38) 580 (72.86) 1041 (80.39) 74.1274 <0.0001
Postponed, afraid of infected 194 (38.88) 209 (26.26) 403 (31.12) 22.7947 <0.0001
As planned (on time), online 4 (0.80) 22 (2.76) 26 (2.01) 6.0026 0.0140
As planned (on time), face‐to‐face 13 (2.61) 172 (21.61) 185 (14.29) 90.4530 <0.0001
Hospitalised delivery (plan, reason/way) ** n = 203 n = 87 n = 290
Postponed, inconvenience 96 (47.29) 27 (31.03) 123 (42.41) 6.5891 0.0103
Postponed, afraid of infected (self) 102 (50.25) 37 (42.53) 139 (47.93) 1.4534 0.2280
Postponed, afraid of infected (baby) 104 (51.23) 37 (42.53) 141 (48.62) 1.8464 0.1742
Ahead of time, waiting for labour 35 (17.24) 9 (10.34) 44 (15.17) 2.2506 0.1336
Ahead of time, caesarean in advance 31 (15.27) 6 (6.90) 37 (12.76) 3.8370 0.0501
As planned (on time) 39 (19.21) 34 (39.08) 73 (25.17) 12.7634 0.0004
Delivery mode * n = 932 n = 1015 n = 1947 43.0645 <0.0001
Always CS 174 (18.67) 266 (26.21) 440 (22.60)
Always VD 588 (63.09) 657 (64.73) 1245 (63.94)
Change from CS to VD 52 (5.58) 31 (3.05) 83 (4.26)
Change from VD to CS 118 (12.66) 61 (6.01) 179 (9.19)
Infant feeding * n = 932 n = 1015 n = 1947 38.4869 <0.0001
Always breastfeeding 777 (83.37) 919 (90.54) 1696 (87.11)
Always bottle feeding 23 (2.47) 35 (3.45) 58 (2.98)
Change from breast to bottle 92 (9.87) 48 (4.73) 140 (7.19)
Change from bottle to breast 40 (4.29) 13 (1.28) 53 (2.72)
Postnatal resting place * n = 932 n = 1015 n = 1947 71.1758 <0.0001
Always home 687 (73.71) 847 (83.45) 1534 (78.79)
Always PSI 59 (6.33) 94 (9.26) 153 (7.86)
Change from home to PSI 24 (2.58) 5 (0.49) 29 (1.49)
Change from PSI to home 162 (17.38) 69 (6.80) 231 (11.86)
Impact of changing schedule *** n = 932 n = 1015 n = 1947 191.4008 <0.0001
Completely no impact 11 (1.18) 12 (1.18) 23 (1.18)
Almost no impact 25 (2.68) 81 (7.98) 106 (5.44)
Slight impact 149 (15.99) 335 (33.00) 484 (24.86)
Comparative impact 378 (40.56) 446 (43.94) 824 (42.32)
Significant impact 369 (39.59) 141 (13.89) 510 (26.19)
Impact of reduced activities *** n = 932 n = 1015 n = 1947 113.0946 <0.0001
Completely no impact 19 (2.04) 24 (2.36) 43 (2.21)
Almost no impact 50 (5.36) 110 (10.84) 160 (8.22)
Slight impact 194 (20.82) 332 (32.71) 526 (27.02)
Comparative impact 371 (39.81) 425 (41.87) 796 (40.88)
Significant impact 298 (31.97) 124 (12.22) 422 (21.67)
Impact of chest CT scan *** n = 932 n = 1015 n = 1947 5.5295 0.0187
Completely no impact 9 (0.97) 1 (0.10) 10 (0.51)
Almost no impact 20 (2.15) 14 (1.38) 34 (1.75)
Slight impact 126 (13.52) 99 (9.75) 225 (11.56)
Comparative impact 326 (34.98) 377 (37.14) 703 (36.11)
Significant impact 451 (48.39) 524 (51.63) 975 (50.08)

CS, caesarean section delivery; PSI, postnatal resting institution; VD, vaginal delivery.

Data are n (%). Comparations were conducted across the two cities.

a

Chi‐square test was used.

b

Multiple choice, Chi‐square test was used for each choice.

c

Kruskal–Wallis test was used.