Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 26;190(4):529–532. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16993

Table I.

Main characteristics and findings of studies.

Study Setting N Age, years ± SD (range) Males (%) Prevalence of DM/CVD/PD (%) Median (range) SOFA/PaO2/FiO2 Antithrombotic treatment dosing Prevalence of DVT/PE (%) D‐dimer (μg/ml; median values) and predictive value (ratio and 95% CI)
Stoneham et al. 3 General ward 274 VTE 67 ± 12 VTE 67 VTE 38/29/38 NR NR 2/6

VTE vs. non‐VTE: 4·1 vs. 1·2

Adjusted OR for VTE: 1·4 (1·2,1·8)

Wright et al. 4 ICU 44 54 (19–86) 64 41/NR/14 8 (7–10)/163 (127–235) Prophylactic 25/0 1·8 (0·9–4·1)
Thomas et al. 5 ICU 63 59 ± 13 69 NR NR Prophylactic 2/8 0·4 (0·1–3·6)
Middeldorp et al. 6 General ward 62%; ICU 38% 198 61 ± 14 66 NR NR Mainly prophylactic 13/7

VTE vs. non‐VTE: 2·6 vs. 1·0

Subhazard ratio for VTE: 1·4 (1·1,1·9)

Helms et al. 7 ICU 150 63 (53–71) 81 20/48/14 8 (5–10)/125 (97–170) Mainly prophylactic 2/17 2·3 (1·2–20·0)
Lodigiani et al. 8 General ward 84%; ICU 16% 388 66 (55–85) 68 23/33/9 NR Mixed doses 2/3 Rapid increase in D‐dimer in non‐survivors
Poissy et al. 9 ICU 107 PE 57 (29–80) PE 59 NR

PE

4 (0–4)/NR

Prophylactic 5/21 Subhazard ratio for PE: 1·8 (1·0,3·2)
Tavazzi et al. 10 ICU 54 VTE 68 ± 7 NR NR NR Prophylactic 15/6 NR
Llitjos et al. 11 ICU 26 68 (52–75) 77 NR 3 (2–5)/87 (74–116) Mainly therapeutic 54/23 1·8 (1·1–2·9)
Beun et al. 12 ICU 75 NR NR NR NR NR 4/27 NR
Klok et al. 13 ICU 184 64 ± 12 76 NR NR Mainly prophylactic 2/35 NR

CI, confidence intervals; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; ICU, intensive care unit; NR, not reported; OR, odds ratio; PaO2, arterial partial pressure of oxygen; PD, pulmonary disease; PE, pulmonary embolism; SD, standard deviation; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; VTE, venous thromboembolic events.