Table 2.

Statistical results of the comparison with the reference genome.

Sample name	Total reads	Mapped reads	Mapped ratio (%)	Uniquely map	Uniquely mapped ratio (%)	Reads mapped to “+” strand	Reads mapped to “+” strand ratio (%)	Reads mapped to “-” strand	Reads mapped to “-” strand ratio (%)
PT1	58271822	51290093	88.02%	48720157	83.61%	25470179	43.71%	25437454	43.65%
PT2	65037488	55445945	85.25%	52738564	81.09%	27563636	42.38%	27476279	43.65%
PT3	65316422	56957569	87.2%	54089388	82.81%	28293609	43.32%	28228884	43.22%
PT4	75506064	64269152	85.12%	61021292	80.82%	31904145	42.25%	31888064	42.23%
PT5	68292034	53465050	78.29%	50826310	74.42%	26552333	42.25%	26493568	38.79%
PX1	50908394	43024726	84.51%	40845785	80.23%	21424253	42.08%	21316946	41.87%
PX2	67418530	58984363	87.49%	55702668	82.62%	29322172	43.49%	29258327	43.40%
PX3	59116686	51374316	86.90%	48593438	82.20%	25530131	43.19%	25474898	43.09%
PX4	50070956	42965914	85.81%	40786889	81.46%	21351653	42.64%	21342061	42.62%
PX5	58923046	51046402	86.63%	48489963	82.29%	25375162	43.06%	25318363	42.97%