Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2016 Apr;50(2):167–176. doi: 10.1007/s12160-015-9741-0

Table 5.

Unadjusted & adjusted analyses of participant-specific slope estimates

Participants Effect Change/wk Change/34 wks p-value Sig
Unadjusted
All participants Control −0.0032 −0.11 0.3933
Intervention −0.0082 −0.28 0.0272 *
Diff (Cont - Int) 0.0050 0.17 0.3450
≥ 4 sessions Control −0.0066 −0.22 0.1436
Intervention −0.0120 −0.41 0.0073 *
Diff (Cont - Int) 0.0054 0.18 0.3889
Adjusted
All participants Control −0.0055 −0.19 0.1649
Intervention −0.0093 −0.32 0.0144 *
Diff (Cont - Int) 0.0038 0.13 0.4836
≥4 sessions Control −0.0091 −0.31 0.0813
Intervention −0.0124 −0.42 0.0065 *
Diff (Cont - Int) 0.0033 0.11 0.6279

Note. For the unadjusted panel (top), change/wk is the estimate of the mean slope computed from a mixed two-factor (group × shift) ANOVA model where the outcome is the participant-specific slope (from regressing interdialytic weight gain on time in weeks) and shift is a random factor. For the adjusted panel (bottom), change/wk is the estimate of the mean slope computed from a mixed three-factor (group × education × shift) ANOVA model where the outcome is the participant-specific slope (from regressing interdialytic weight gain on time in weeks) and shift is a random factor. Change/34 weeks = 34(change/wk) and represents the estimated change from 1 week pre-intervention to 33 weeks after beginning the intervention. Education is categorized as < high school, high school, and > high school. All results account for within-shift correlation. Sig = “*” if p-value < .05. Diff = control-minus-intervention difference in change estimates.