Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 15;25(4):401–411. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02297-4

Table 3.

Comparison of operative management for adult acute appendicitis: open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy

Event/Total (%)* Open (n = 133) Laparoscopic (n = 104) P value

Age (years)

median, range

35 [29–51.5] 37.5 [25–53] 0.934
Female 47/133 (35) 56/104 (54) 0.006
No comorbidity 119/133 (90) 95/104 (91) 0.665
Time of day of operation
 8 am–6 pm 87/133 (66) 62/102 (61) 0.135
 6 pm–10 pm 32/133 (24) 20/102 (20)
 10 pm–8 am 14/133 (11) 20/102 (20)
Operative time
  < 30 min 3/133 (2) 5/102 (5) 0.612
 30−60 min 53/133 (40) 44/102 (43)
 60–90 min 57/133 (43) 35/102 (34)
 90–120 min 16/133 (16) 14/102 (14)
  > 120 min 4/133 (3) 4/102 (4)
Consultant performed procedure 49/133 (37) 33/103 (32) 0.173
Consultant performing or assisting 72/133 (54) 42/103 (41) 0.04
Postoperative care
 Level 2 High Dependency Unit 4/133 (3) 3/103 (3) 0.749
 Level 3 Intensive Care Unit 3/133 (2) 1/103 (1)
Converted to open from laparoscopic 11/104 (11)

Length of stay (days)

median, range

3 [2–5] 2 [2–4] 0.012

Laparoscopic converted to open included in the laparoscopic group. 19 cases excluded due to insufficient information. Continuous data is presented as median [IQR]; p values calculated by Mann–Whitney−U. Categorical data are presented as number/denominator (percentage); p values calculated by χ2 or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate

The bold typeset in the table highlights statistical significance

*Unless otherwise indicated