Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 26;4(13):2866–2870. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001482

Table 1.

Characteristics and univariate analysis of factors associated with response and survival of the 44 MDS patients who received venetoclax and hypomethylating agent therapy

Baseline characteristics Overall response, % Overall survival
Variable Total evaluable, n Frequency, n (%) Yes No P HR (95% CI) Log rank
Age, y 44 .13 0.10
 ≤60 8 (18) 62 38 1
 60-67 11 (25) 82 18 1.76 (0.16-19.51)
 67-74 13 (30) 62 38 4.47 (0.54-37.28)
 >74 12 (27) 33 67 6.64 (0.83-53.36)
Sex 44 .36 0.16
 Male 24 (55) 67 33 1
 Female 20 (45) 50 50 2.00 (0.75-5.33)
Therapy related 44 .11 <0.01
 No 29 (66) 69 31 1
 Yes 15 (34) 40 60 3.82 (1.4-10.46)
HMA exposure 44 .26 0.82
 Naive 12 (28) 75 25 1
 ≤4 cycles 16 (36) 62 38 1.12 (0.30-4.2)
 HMA failure 16 (36) 44 56 1.43 (0.42-4.84)
Bone marrow blast, T0, % 44 .54 0.30
 >10 25 (57) 64 36 1
 ≤10 19 (43) 53 47 1.64 (0.63-4.26)
R-IPSS cytogenetic risk 43 .03 <0.01*
 Other 33 (77) 70 30 1
 Very poor risk 10 (23) 30 70 9.21 (3.04-27.89)
TP53 mutated 40 .15 <0.01*
 No 29 (72) 66 34 1
 Yes 11 (28) 36 64 8.32 (2.48-27.96)
R-IPSS risk 42 .12 <0.01*
 Other 24 (57) 71 29 1
 Very high risk 18 (43) 44 56 7.94 (2.2-28.68)
Type of HMA with venetoclax 44 .22 0.03
 Azacitidine 27 (61) 67 33 1
 Decitabine 17 (39) 47 53 2.78 (1.05-7.35)
Venetoclax dose, T0, mg 43 1 0.45
 400 18 (42) 61 39 1
 200 16 (37) 62 38 0.81 (0.23-2.81)
 ≤100 9 (21) 56 44 1.78 (0.56-5.65)
Azole antifungals 44 .36 0.39
 No 25 (57) 52 48 1
 Yes 19 (43) 68 32 1.53 (0.58-4.01)
Cycle 2 or 3 delay ≥7 d 24 .41 0.92
 No 8 (33) 50 50 1.09 (0.21-5.56)
 Yes 16 (67) 69 31 1
Venetoclax dosing first cycle, d 44 .42 0.56
 ≤14 4 (9) 50 50 1
 15-21 6 (14) 83 17 0.51 (0.13-1.69)
 22-28 34 (77) 56 44 0.47 (0.10-2.71)

Boldface numbers indicate variables with P < .05.

CI, confidence interval; T0, time at start of combination treatment.

P values below Bonferroni-adjusted level considering all comparisons, 0.0017 (0.05/30).