Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 8;10:979. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00979

Table 2.

Association between FAP mRNA expression and clinicopathological features in the TCGA cohort.

Clinical features Low FAP expression High FAP expression p
n (%) n (%)
Gender (n = 591) Female (n = 271) 133 (49.1%) 138 (50.9%) 0.81
Male (n = 320) 154 (48.1%) 166 (51.9%)
AJCC stages (n = 571)* Stage I + II (n = 316) 167 (52.8%) 149 (47.2%) 0.02
Stage III + IV (n = 255) 111 (43.5%) 144 (56.5%)
Microsatellite instability (n = 115)* MSI (n = 11) 7 (63.6%) 4 (36.4%) 0.42
MSS (n = 104) 53 (51.0%) 51 (49.0%)
CRC subtyping (n = 556)* CMS1 (n = 97) 36 (37.1%) 61 (62.9%) <0.001**
CMS2 (n = 170) 129 (75.9%) 41 (24.1%)
CMS3 (n = 94) 66 (70.2%) 28 (29.8%)
CMS4 (n = 195) 17 (8.7%) 178 (91.3%)
CRC location (n = 597)* Cecum (n = n = 106) 56 (52.8%) 50 (47.2%) 0.4
Ascending colon (n = 86) 31 (36.0%) 55 (64.0%)
Descending colon (n = 20) 9 (45.0%) 11 (55.0%)
Transverse colon (n = 38) 20 (52.6%) 18 (47.4%)
Sigmoid colon (n = 155) 75 (48.4%) 80 (51.6%)
Hepatic flexure (n = 26) 12 (46.2%) 14 (53.8%)
Splenic flexure (n = 7) 4 (57.0%) 3 (43.0%)
Rectosigmoid junction (n = 49) 24 (49.0%) 25 (51.0%)
Rectum (n = 110) 60 (55.0%) 50 (45.0%)
*

Patients with data not available, unknown, and discrepancies.

**

Statistical power >70% (estimated by bootstrapping).

All 2 × 2 contingency tables were analyzed with Fisher exact tests. All others by χ2 test.