Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cognit Ther Res. 2017 Nov 11;42:315–327.

Table 5.

Observed mean (SD) scores on outcomes measures for the follow-up sample only (n = 20) for a study of group exposure therapy (ET) for hoarding disorder

Assessment Active treatment (0–6 months)
Follow-up (6–12 months)a
Time point
Average % change d (95% CI) Time effect
Time point
Time effect
Baseline (n = 20) 3 months (n = 20) 6 months (n = 20) β (SE) p 9 months (n = 19) 12 months (n = 16) β (SE) p
SI-R 54.15 (10.99) 47.79 (12.73) 43.00 (13.69) − 20.59 0.90 (0.23–1.56) − 11.37 (2.00) <.001 40.67 (16.53) 42.56 (19.45) 1.18 (2.57) .644
CIR   3.60 (1.22)   2.75 (1.07) − 23.61 0.74 (0.10–1.38) − 0.85 (0.22) <.001
ADL-H 27.89 (8.77) 23.94 (6.03) 23.33 (5.26) − 16.35 0.62 (− .09–1.31) − 4.54 (1.16) < .001 22.71 (6.02) 26.14 (8.61) 2.79 (0.99) .005
HADS Anxiety   8.65 (4.80)   8.11 (4.21) − 6.24 0.12 (−.51–.75) − 0.77 (0.86) .373
HADS Depression   6.80 (4.40)   5.89 (4.24) − 13.38 0.21 (− .42–.84) − 1.02 (0.66) .121
CGI Severity   3.45 (1.05)   3.65 (0.93) 5.80 − 0.20 (− .82–.42) 0.20 (0.24) .406

Analyses were mixed-effects linear regression models using the ITT sample. This sample was comprised of participants who completed at least one follow-up assessment

ADL-H activities of daily living-hoarding, CGI clinical global impressions, CIR clutter image rating, HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SI-R savings inventory-revised

a

These analyses assessed the change from the post-treatment assessment (at 6 months from baseline) through the follow up assessments (at 9 and 12 months from baseline)