Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2019 Nov 26;134:105329. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105329

Table 3:

The correlation between BAM/TEOM and FRM PM2.5 daily averaged measurements by site

Region Site ID Days with BAM FRM-BAM Pearson’s r BAM RMSE Days with TEOM FRM-TEOM Pearson’s r TEOM RMSE
Seattle PSCA3 --- --- --- 149 0.99 0.71
Metropolitan PSCA4 309 0.98 2.44 385 0.98 1.82
LA L001 532 0.96 4.86 --- --- ---
L(R)002 337 0.97 3.21 --- --- ---
L005 457 0.97 3.07 --- --- ---
Baltimore B009 345 0.93 1.68 --- --- ---
B011 25 0.94 1.34 --- --- ---
Chicago C004* 91 0.78 4.23 --- --- ---
C008 149 0.93 1.76 --- --- ---
NYC N001 --- --- --- 115 0.88 2.62
N005* --- --- --- 53 0.84 2.50
N006* --- --- --- 188 0.87 2.14
Minneapolis/St. Paul S006 66 0.98 0.81 --- --- ---
Winston-Salem W001* --- --- --- 76 0.95 1.10

Note:

(*)

Indicates sites with NRMs (TEOM/BAM) whose method code is not classified by EPA as FEM. In present study NRMs were grouped into “FEM” category