Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 17;7(3):ENEURO.0223-20.2020. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0223-20.2020

Table 6.

Two-way ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis parameters for extracellular recordings in GnRH-GFP-3Dq and GnRH-GFP mice

Comparison (figure) Control vs PNA Saline vs CNO Interaction
Two-way ANOVA for firing rate (Hz) inGnRH-GFP-3Dq mice (6A) F(1,35) = 0.021, p = 0.885 F(1,35) = 1.865, p = 0.181 F(1,35) = 0.104, p = 0.749
Naive vs sham Naive vs 4Di Naive vs 3Dq
Kruskal–Wallis (KW = 8.361)/Dunn (6B) p > 0.99 p > 0.99 p = 0.0169