Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2020 May 17;258:113033. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113033

Table 2.

Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of food insecurity transition status with major depression, Health and Retirement Study 2008–2016a

Model 1b
Year and Baseline Mental Health
Model 2c
Model 1 + Demographics
Model 3d
Model 2 + Socioeconomic Status
Model 4e
Model 3 + Health Status
Model 5f
Model 4 + Life Transitions
Characteristics OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Food Insecurity Transition <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Not food insecure Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
Initially food insecure 1.8 (1.5, 2.1) 1.6 (1.4, 2.0) 1.4 (1.2, 1.8) 1.3 (1.1, 1.6) 1.2 (1.0, 1.5)
Became food insecure 2.4 (2.0, 2.9) 2.3 (1.9, 2.7) 2.0 (1.6, 2.4) 1.8 (1.5, 2.2) 1.7 (1.4, 2.0)
Remained food insecure 2.8 (2.4, 3.4) 2.5 (2.1, 3.0) 2.1 (1.7, 2.5) 1.8 (1.5, 2.2) 1.7 (1.4, 2.0)
a

Unique subjects n=20,415

b

Model 1 accounts for baseline major depression status and time period

c

Model 2 accounts for all variables in Model 1, plus age, gender, race/ethnicity, and marital status

d

Model 3 accounts for all variables in Model 2, plus educational attainment, wealth, poverty status, work status, and retirement status

e

Model 4 accounts for all variables in Model 3, plus functional limitations and having a chronic condition

f

Model 5 accounts for all variables in Model 4, plus becoming divorced or widowed, employment loss, change in income, and being diagnosed with a new chronic condition