Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genomics. 2020 May 6;112(5):2937–2941. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.05.003

Table 1.

Summary of the ddPCR and amplicon-based NGS results for the detected mosaicism.

Parent Sample ddPCR Amplicon-based NGS qPCR
father of proband 12 blood 18.5% rs6727415: 13.9% (A 1259, G 910) Not tested
rs1234405: 17.3%(A 1444, C 943)
rs1234413: 15.9% (C 1203, T 820)
Average VAF: 15.7%
father of proband 26 blood undetectable rs1023367: 7.3% (C 1162, T 993) 0.39%
rs8132955: 2.3% (A 636, T 607)
rs218652: 0.7% (A 1470, G 1450)
father of proband 32 blood 6.2% no informative SNPs Not tested
mother of proband 38 blood 15.6% no informative SNPs Not tested
buccal 10.6%
saliva 8.2%
urine undetectable

The scale and levels of low-level parental somatic mosaicism are incompletely understood.

We propose an approach for more effective detection of low-level parental somatic mosaicism for CNV deletions for a more accurate assessment and estimate of disease recurrence risk.