Table 1.
Efficacy of local estrogen therapy (vaginal estrogen versus placebo or no treatment) on pelvic floor disorders: quality of studies and profile of evidence
PFD | Quality of studiesa | Parameters | Outcomes | Qualityof evidenceb |
---|---|---|---|---|
VA | Fair | Subj. +obj. | Improved | Moderate |
OAB | Fair | Subjective | Improved | Low |
SUI | Fair | Subjective | Improved | Low + moderate |
UI | Fair | Objective | Improved | Low-moderate |
POP | Poor | Subjective | Unclear | Low |
aQuality of studies: good-fair-poor (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality). Owens DK et al. (2010) AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions–Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the effective health-care program. J Clin Epidemiol. 63: 513–23
bGrade of evidence: high-moderate-poor (Grades for Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system). Atkins D et al. (2004) Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches. The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res. 4: 38
Abbreviations
PFD pelvic floor disorders, VA vaginal atrophy, Subj. + obj. subjective + objective, UI urinary incontinence, OAB symptoms overactive bladder symptoms, SUI stress urinary incontinence, POP pelvic organ prolapse