Table 3.
Estimated regression coefficients for the effect of earning potential (M3 and M4) and unemployment risks of both partners (M5 and M6) on the transition to second birth
| AT | BE | BG | LT | PL | RO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M3 | ||||||
| Earning potential | ||||||
| Her earning potential |
0.04 (0.05) |
0.16*** (0.04) |
− 0.11** (0.03) |
− 0.01 (0.03) |
− 0.11*** (0.02) |
− 0.17*** (0.05) |
| His earning potential |
0.02 (0.06) |
0.16 ** (0.05) |
0.08 (0.05) |
0.01 (0.05) |
− 0.02 (0.04) |
− 0.02 (0.07) |
| ln-L | − 13,226 | − 10,017 | − 19,499 | − 13,146 | − 34,504 | − 13,384 |
| M4 | ||||||
| Earning potential | ||||||
| Her earning potential |
0.06 (0.05) |
0.11* (0.05) |
− 0.11** (0.03) |
− 0.03 (0.04) |
− 0.08** (0.03) |
− 0.15* (0.06) |
| His earning potential |
0.04 (0.06) |
0.16** (0.05) |
0.07 (0.05) |
0.00 (0.05) |
− 0.01 (0.04) |
− 0.02 (0.07) |
| Gender-composition partners’ field of study | ||||||
| % Women in her field |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.01** (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
| % Women in his field |
− 0.01*** (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
| ln-L | − 13,218 | − 10,010 | − 19,497 | − 13,139 | − 34,497 | − 13,379 |
| M5 | ||||||
| Unemployment risks | ||||||
| Her unemployment |
− 0.36** (0.14) |
− 0.42*** (0.08) |
0.32** (0.09) |
− 0.02 (0.07) |
0.22*** (0.06) |
0.40*** (0.11) |
| His unemployment |
− 0.27* (0.10) |
− 0.36*** (0.10) |
− 0.11 (0.09) |
− 0.14 (0.09) |
− 0.12 (0.07) |
0.00 (0.14) |
| ln-L | − 13,242 | − 10,027 | − 19,499 | − 13,145 | − 34,524 | − 13,397 |
| M6 | ||||||
| Unemployment risks | ||||||
| Her unemployment |
− 0.51** (0.18) |
− 0.35** (0.11) |
0.38** (0.10) |
0.01 (0.09) |
0.14* (0.06) |
0.45** (0.17) |
| His unemployment |
− 0.23* (0.11) |
− 0.34*** (0.10) |
− 0.11 (0.09) |
− 0.12 (0.09) |
− 0.12 (0.07) |
− 0.08 (0.17) |
| Gender-composition partners’ field of study | ||||||
| % Women in her field |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00* (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
| % Women in his field |
− 0.01*** (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
0.00 (0.00) |
| ln-L | − 13,232 | − 10,026 | − 19,496 | − 13,140 | − 34,516 | − 13,389 |
Robust standard errors in parentheses; significance: ‘*’ = 5%; ‘**’ = 1%; ‘***’ = 0.1%. All models include duration splines, unions’ cohort, woman’s age at first birth and its square, respondent enrolment status, sex of the respondent, age difference between partners, respondent’s union order, marital status of the couple