Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 28;105(3):316–321. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317630

Table 4.

Proportion of time participants spent within and outside target and safe ranges, comparing data from concealed continuous SpO2 monitoring and nurses’ clinical records from intermittent monitoring

All patients: median (95% CI) Group A: median (95% CI) Group B: median (95% CI)
As per continuous monitoring
 Below safe range 1.5% (1.0 to 2.3) 2.7% (1.7 to 5.6) 0.9% (0.3 to 1.4)
 Within safe range 96.2% (83.9 to 98.5) 19.3% (16.2 to 24.3) 99.1% (98.5 to 99.5)
 Within target range 92.5% (78.5 to 96.3) 15.7% (13.3 to 18.9) 97.3% (96.4 to 98.7)
 Above target range N/A 75.0% (63.6 to 81.1) N/A
As per nurses’ record of intermittent monitoring
 Below safe range 7.3% 16.0% 3.6%
 Within safe range 79.3% 45.8% 96.4%
 Within target range 73.1% 33.2% 92.8%
 Above target range N/A 38.2% N/A

Group A: preterm/low birthweight neonates on oxygen (target range 90%–95%; safe range 85%–95%). Group B: term neonates, and any neonates not on oxygen (target range 90%–100%; safe range 85%–100%).

N/A, not applicable.