Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 14;40(15):e00150-20. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00150-20

FIG 8.

FIG 8

Synthetic growth defects of prf1-R262E spt5 and prf1-R296E spt5 double mutants. (A) Fivefold serial dilutions of strains were spotted onto agar plates containing control medium (YES), medium with 0.01% MMS, or rich medium with 15 mg/ml TBZ. Strains are indicated on the left. All experiments were repeated at least 3 times, and representative pictures are shown. (B) Immunoblots of whole-cell extracts from the indicated strains (top). Ratios of TAP/Rpb1 signals for each sample were normalized to that in prf1-TAP spt5+. Error bars denote standard errors of the means from 3 independent experiments (bottom). One-way ANOVA was conducted across all prf1+ strains within an spt5+ background followed by two-sided t tests with Bonferroni correction between each prf1+ mutant strain and the prf1-TAP strain in the same spt5+ background.