Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;23(7):101331. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101331

Table 1.

Subcellular Localization, Numbers, and Enrichment of Ribosomal Proteins (RPs) Regulated at the Transcript Level during Acclimation

Subcellular Localization & Subunit HL
Heat
Cold
Total
# (Up/Down) FE # (Up/Down) FE # (Up/Down) FE
Cytosol

40S 20 (0/20) 0.83 28 (2/26) 1.01 56 (56/0) 1.10 101
60S 41 (2/39) 1.04 39 (0/39) 0.86 110 (110/0) 1.32∗ 165
All 61 (2/59) 0.96 67 (2/65) 0.91 166 (166/0) 1.24∗ 266
Chloroplast

30S 9 (0/9) 1.44 10 (0/10) 1.40 3 (2/1) 0.23∗ 26
50S 16 (0/16) 1.31 23 (0/23) 1.64∗ 9 (7/2) 0.35∗ 51
All 25 (0/25) 1.35∗ 33 (0/33) 1.56∗ 12 (9/3) 0.31∗ 77
Mitochondrion

30S 0.00∗ 0.00∗ 0.00∗ 13
50S 1 (0/1) 0.60 0.00 5(5/0) 1.42 7
All 1 (0/1) 0.21∗ 0 (0/0) 0.00∗ 5 (5/0) 0.50∗ 20
Total

87 (2/85) 100 (2/98) 183 (180/3) 363

Transcriptional super-hubs for RPs were classified according to the subcellular localization of the corresponding ribosomal subunits based on MapMan (Thimm et al., 2004). The total number of transcripts in each category and the fold enrichment (FE) relative to the expected frequency of RPs are listed. The regulatory trend (up- or down-regulation) refers to changes in the transcript levels at 4 days of acclimation compared with the initial time point. Statistical significance of the enrichment according Fisher's two-sided exact test (p ≤ 0.05) is indicated by an asterisk.