Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 9;12:411–429. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S243204

Table 1.

Mean Log10 Delta and Slow-Oscillatory Power Spectral Density Relative to Auditory Stimulation

Within-Condition Comparisons
Study Condition Power Frequency Range Pre-Stimulus Baseline Stimulation df t p
(5 sec)a (10 sec)a
Enhancing 0.5–4 Hz (Delta) 1.66 (0.04) 1.76 (0.03) 7 4.91 .002
0.5–1 Hz (SO) 1.94 (0.04) 2.08 (0.03) 7 5.52 <.001
Disruptive 0.5–4 Hz (Delta) 1.54 (0.05) 1.67 (0.06) 7 5.49 .001
0.5–1 Hz (SO) 1.78 (0.06) 1.95 (0.07) 7 6.04 <.001
Between-Condition Comparisons
Time Window Power Frequency Range Disruptivea Enhancinga df t p
Pre-stimulus baseline
(5 sec)
0.5–4 Hz (Delta) 1.54 (0.05) 1.66 (0.04) 7 4.03 .005
0.5–1 Hz (SO) 1.78 (0.06) 1.94 (0.04) 7 4.39 .003
Stimulation period
(10 sec)
0.5–4 Hz (Delta) 1.67 (0.06) 1.76 (0.03) 7 2.60 .035
0.5–1 Hz (SO) 1.95 (0.07) 2.08 (0.03) 7 2.62 .034
Change from pre-stimulus baseline to stimulation 0.5–4 Hz (Delta) 0.13 (0.02) 0.10 (0.02) 7 0.90 .396
0.5–1 Hz (SO) 0.18 (0.03) 0.14 (0.02) 7 1.18 .278

Notes: Upper panel: mean log10 delta (0.5–4 Hz) and slow-oscillatory (0.5–1 Hz) power spectral density within each study condition, during auditory stimulation (10 sec) relative to the 5-sec baseline period preceding stimulation. Lower panel: differences in power spectral density between Disruptive and Enhancing study condition nights, within the 5-sec pre-stimulus baseline period, 10-sec stimulus period, and the pre-stimulus to stimulation change. Power within a frequency range was calculated across all stimuli initiated during stages N2 and N3 within a study condition (Enhancing or Disruptive) and at all sound pressure levels. aMean (standard error of the mean). p-values in bold are interpreted as significant (p < .05).

Abbreviation: SO, slow oscillation.