Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 7;22(8):1409–1413. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz225

Table 2.

Association of Baseline Ever Blunt/Non-Blunt Cannabis Use With Subsequent Combustible Tobacco-Only Product Use, Stratified by Baseline e-cigarette and Hookah Use

Never baseline e-cigarette/hookah users Baseline e-cigarette/hookah users
Combustible tobacco-only product use at follow-up Combustible tobacco-only product use at follow-up
No n (%)1 Yes n (%)1 Odds ratio2 (95% CI) No n (%)1 Yes n (%)1 Odds ratio3 (95% CI)
E-cigarettes4
 Blunt use 61 (76.3) 19 (23.8) 3.86 (2.11 to 7.05)* 105 (74.5) 36 (25.5) 1.26 (0.75 to 2.11)
 Non-blunt cannabis use 51 (82.3) 11 (17.7) 3.25 (1.59 to 6.66)* 39 (75.0) 13 (25.0) 1.59 (0.76 to 3.30)
 No cannabis use 2241 (95.8) 99 (4.2) Ref. 250 (83.9) 48 (16.1) Ref.
Hookah5
 Blunt use 71 (79.8) 18 (20.2) 5.04 (2.77 to 9.19)* 95 (72.0) 37 (28.0) 1.16 (0.71 to 1.91)
 Non-blunt cannabis use 58 (84.1) 11 (15.9) 4.13 (2.05 to 8.32)* 32 (71.1) 13 (28.9) 1.35 (0.66 to 2.75)
 No cannabis use 2266 (96.4) 85 (3.6) Ref. 225 (78.4) 62 (21.6) Ref.

1Percentages are row percentages within strata. Percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding.

2Odds ratios are for the effect of blunt/non-blunt cannabis use on combustible tobacco product use among never e-cigarette users (top) or never hookah users (bottom).

3Odds ratios are for the effect of blunt/non-blunt cannabis use on combustible tobacco product use among ever e-cigarette users (top) or ever hookah users (bottom).

4Odds ratios are adjusted for gender, race/ethnicity, grade, study, and ever hookah use at baseline. p for interaction = .0125.

5Odds ratios are adjusted for gender, race/ethnicity, grade, study, and ever e-cigarette use at baseline. p for interaction = .0002.