Table 2.
Optimal (n=24) | Suboptimal(n=31) | Poor (n=30) | P values | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intraretinal fluid | ||||
Absent | 20 (83%) | 26 (87%) | 10 (45%) | 0.89 |
Present | 4 (17%) | 4 (13%) | 4 (13%) | |
Subretinal fluid | ||||
Absent | 9 (37%) | 9 (30%) | 5 (17%) | 0.57 |
Present | 15 (63%) | 21 (67%) | 17 (57%) | |
Drusen | ||||
Absent | 6 (25%) | 6 (19%) | 3 (10%) | 0.60 |
Present | 18 (75%) | 24 (77%) | 20 (67%) | |
Ellipsoid zone | ||||
Disrupted | 18 (75%) | 24 (77%) | 20 (67%) | 0.38 |
Normal | 6 (25%) | 6 (19%) | 2 (7%) | |
Visibility of posterior limit | ||||
Absent | 0 | 1 (3%) | 9 (30%) | <0.001 |
Present | 24 (100%) | 30 (97%) | 21 (70%) | |
Visibility of anterior limit | ||||
Absent | 0 | 6 (19%) | 20 (67%) | <0.001 |
Present | 24 (100%) | 25 (81%) | 10 (33%) | |
Visibility of scleral-choroidal interface | ||||
No | 0 | 10 (32%) | 30 (100%) | <0.001 |
Possible | 2 (8%) | 15 (48%) | 0 | |
Yes | 22 (92%) | 6 (19%) | 0 | |
Inner reflectivity | ||||
Intermediate | 20 (83%) | 9 (30%) | 3 (10%) | <0.001 |
High | 4 (17%) | 22 (70%) | 22 (73%) | |
Type of reflectivity | ||||
High with posterior shadowing | 1 (4%) | 10 (32%) | 21 (70%) | <0.001 |
Heterogeneous | 16 (67%) | 15 (48%) | 1 (3%) | |
Homogenous | 7 (29%) | 6 (19%) | 3 (10%) | |
Lesion configuration* | ||||
No distention | 5 (21%) | 7 (23%) | 0.21 | |
Almond | 12 (50%) | 14 (45%) | ||
Dome | 4 (17%) | 7 (23%) | ||
Plateau | 3 (13%) | 0 | ||
Choriocapillaries visible above lesion* | ||||
Absent | 10 (42%) | 19 (61%) | 0.16 | |
Present | 14 (58%) | 12 (39%) | ||
Vessels within lesion* | ||||
Absent | 18 (75%) | 28 (90%) | 0.14 | |
Present | 6 (25%) | 3 (10%) | ||
Cavities within lesion* | ||||
Absent | 23 (96%) | 31 (100%) | 0.26 | |
Present | 1 (4%) | 0 | ||
Hyporeflective gradation of lesion-scleral interface* | ||||
Absent | 12 (50%) | 27 (87%) | 0.005 | |
Present | 12 (50%) | 4 (13%) | ||
Median choroidal thickness (μm)* (range) | 503 (119–1,676) | 608 (214–1,371) | 0.88 | |
Maximum lesion width (mm)* (range) | 5.11 (1.49–11.03) | 4.90 (0.92–7.63) | 0.69 |
Only lesions with optimal and suboptimal image quality were analysed.