Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul;66(7):509–517.

Table 3.

Outcomes for mask use to prevent viral respiratory tract infections

MASK USERS CONFIRMED INFLUENZA CONFIRMED VIRAL INFLUENZALIKE ILLNESS ANY RESPIRATORY INFECTION

RCTS (N*) RR (95% CI) RCTS (N*) RR (95% CI) RCTS (N*) RR (95% CI) RCTS (N*) RR (95% CI)
Community
  • Community members 2 (1683) 0.93 (0.50–1.75) 0 (0) NA 2 (1683) 0.83 (0.69–0.99) 0 (0) NA
  • Families—sick wearing masks 0 (0) NA 1 (597) 0.98 (0.06–15.54) 2 (794) 0.89 (0.48–1.66) 1 (597) 0.65 (0.19–2.28)
  • Families—healthy wearing masks 1 (220) 2.18 (0.25-19.16) 1 (220) 2.96 (0.67–13.02) 1‡ (220) 1.17 (0.62–2.18) 0 (0) NA
  • Families—healthy and sick wearing masks 4 (1168) 0.95 (0.71–1.26) 0 (0) NA 4 (1377) 1.09 (0.86–1.37) 0 (0) NA
  • Communities staying in tents 1 (2317) 1.24 (0.33–4.59) 2 (2386) 1.18 (0.79–1.78) 1 (69) 0.56 (0.29–1.08) 1 (1810) 1.08 (0.83–1.40)
  • Families—given masks before illness 0 (0) NA 0 (0) NA 1 (789) 0.90 (0.60–1.34) 0 (0) NA
Health care workers
  • Masks vs nothing 1 (431) Not estimable 1 (431) 0.90 (0.33–2.44) 1 (431) 0.26 (0.01–6.42) 2 (463) 0.74 (0.36–1.54)
  • N95 masks vs surgical masks 4§ (6039) 1.10 (0.91–1.32) 4§ (6059) 0.95 (0.83–1.07) 4§ (6662) 0.78 (0.61–1.00) 3§ (5033) 0.95 (0.90–1.00)
  • Surgical masks vs cloth masks 1 (717) 0.98 (0.06–15.62) 1 (717) 0.62 (0.31–1.26) 1 (717) 0.12 (0.02–0.98) 1 (717) 0.62 (0.34–1.11)

NA—not applicable, RCT—randomized controlled trial, RR—risk ratio.

*

The number of patients is modified (reduced) to account for clustering.

Results calculated using a fixed-effects model.

One RCT had 2 arms.

§

Two of the included RCTs had 2 arms, so 4 RCTs would be 6 arms and 3 RCTs would be 5 arms.