Table 2. Evaluation of the sub-characteristics of the system by IT professionals (n=11) and nurses (n=12). Botucatu, SP, Brazil, 2018.
| Characteristics | Sub-characteristics | IT professionals % | Nurses % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Functional suitability | 1.1 Functional integrity | 100 | 92 |
| 1.2 Functional correction | 100 | 100 | |
| 1.3 Functional aptitude | 91 | 100 | |
| 2. Reliability | 2.1 Maturity | 100 | 86 |
| 2.2 Fault tolerance | 86 | 100 | |
| 2.3 Recoverability | 89 | 80 | |
| 2.4 Availability | 100 | 100 | |
| 3. Usability | 3.1 Recognition of suitability | 95 | 100 |
| 3.2 Learnability | 100 | 81 | |
| 3.3 Operability | 95 | 74 | |
| 3.4 Accessibility | 40 | 80 | |
| 3.5 Error protection | 100 | 100 | |
| 3.6 Interface aesthetics | 100 | 96 | |
| 4. Efficiency and performance | 4.1 Time | 95 | 92 |
| 4.2 Resources | 100 | 100 | |
| 4.3 Capacity | 100 | 100 | |
| 5. Compatibility | 5.1 Interoperability | 100 | 90 |
| 5.2 Coexistence | 100 | 100 | |
| 6. Safety | 6.1 Confidentiality | 100 | 100 |
| 6.2 Integrity | 93 | 88 | |
| 6.3 Non-repudiation | 100 | 92 | |
| 6.4 Accountability | 100 | 100 | |
| 6.5 Authentication | 100 | 100 | |
| 7. Maintainability | 7.1 Analyzability | 82 | - |
| 7.2 Modifiability | 73 | - | |
| 7.3 Testability | 100 | - | |
| 7.4 Modularity | 91 | - | |
| 7.5 Reusability | 91 | - | |
| 8. Portability | 8.1 Adaptability | 91 | - |
| 8.2 Capacity to be installed | 100 | - | |
| 8.3 Ability to replace | 100 | - |