Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 16.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019 Sep 24;10(10):4350–4360. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00429

Table 1.

Agonist Potencies and Efficacies in cAMP, pERK, Internalization, β-Arrestin-1 and −2 Pathways (pEC50 and EMAX ± SEM), n (Independent Determinations) = 3–5

CP55,940 AMB-FUBINACA WIN55,212–2 Δ9-THC
cAMP (n = 4) pEC50 9.20 ± 0.10 9.18 ± 0.18 8.12 ± 0.14 7.78 ± 0.26
Emax (span, %) 99.4 ± 3.8 101.1 ± 5.8 92.1 ± 3.3 67.8 ± 8.8
pERK (n = 4, WIN n = 3) pEC50 8.35 ± 0.18 8.80 ± 0.16 6.91 ± 0.11 7.23 ± 0.03
Emax (span, %) 100 ± 1.1 118.2 ± 3.9 113.8 ± 1.5 50.9 ± 5.9
internalization (n = 3) pEC50 8.28 ± 0.13 8.14 ± 0.03 6.60 ± 0.17 7.14 ± 0.12
Emax (1/MRT) 0.0753 ± 0.0040 0.1197 ± 0.0082 0.1465 ± 0.0081 0.023 ± 0.0035
β-arrestin-1 (n = 4) pEC50 7.29 ± 0.33 7.05 ± 0.09 ~5.48 ± 0.17 ND
Emax (span, %) 19.1 ± 9.6 101.7 ± 2.5 ND ND
β-arrestin-2 (n = 4) pEC50 6.75 ± 0.14 7.26 ± 0.04 ~5.89 ± 0.05 ND
Emax (span, %) 57.2 ± 2.6 102.4 ± 1.3 ND ND