Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 3;105(9):2950–2963. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa337

Table 2.

Results of NMA and TMA for Improving Menstrual Frequency

TMA NMA
Study Group Studies Participants Heterogeneity Effect Estimate (95% CI) Effect Estimate (95% CrI)
Menstrual frequency(a)* 5
GLP-1 vs MET 3 81 (P = 0.0005); I2 = 87% 0.04 (−0.16, 0.24) 0.04 (−0.14, 0.22)
TZD vs MET 2 59 (P = 0.77); I2= 0% −0.01 (−0.11, 0.09) −0.01 (−0.24, 0.21)
MET + GLP-1 vs MET 2 53 (P = 0.002); I2 = 89% 0.15 (−0.11, 0.41) 0.10 (−0.11, 0.30)
MET + GLP-1 vs GLP-1 2 50 (P = 0.81); I2 = 0% 0.02 (0.02, 0.02) 0.06 (−0.15, 0.26)
Menstrual frequency(b)** 5
TZD vs MET 3 139 (P = 0.22); I2 = 35% 1.82 (0.76, 4.36) 1.80 (0.88, 3.67)
MET + TZD vs MET 3 204 (P = 0.80); I2 = 0% 4.40 (1.95, 9.96) 3.68 (1.65, 8.20)
MET + TZD vs TZD 1 44 Not applicable 1.13 (0.30, 4.27) 2.05 (0.77, 5.42)

Abbreviations: GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; MET, metformin; TZD, thiazolidinedione.

*Menstrual frequency(a) is menstrual cycle frequency (cycles per month).

** Menstrual frequency(b) is menstrual recovery.