Table 1.
Characteristics of women included in the analyses, by degree of weight change between the earliest available weight and weight at or close to recruitment to the study
Factor1 | Weight change category2 | Overall | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loss ≥5 kg | Stable (±4.9 kg) | Gain 5–9.9 kg | Gain 10–14.9 kg | Gain 15–19.9 kg | Gain ≥20 kg | |||
Height (cm) | Mean | 165.0 | 164.4 | 164.9 | 165.0 | 165.2 | 165.6 | 164.8 |
Age at first weight3 | Mean | 19.9 | 22.1 | 20.1 | 19.5 | 19.3 | 19.1 | 20.6 |
First weight (kg) | Mean | 71.4 | 57.5 | 56.4 | 56.7 | 57.8 | 60.5 | 58.2 |
First BMI (kg/m2) | Mean | 26.2 | 21.3 | 20.7 | 20.8 | 21.2 | 22.0 | 21.4 |
Age at recruitment (years) | Mean | 37.9 | 37.6 | 38.8 | 39.8 | 40.2 | 40.4 | 39.3 |
Recruitment weight (kg) | Mean | 60.6 | 58.5 | 63.6 | 68.8 | 74.8 | 89.2 | 65.7 |
Recruitment BMI (kg/m2) | Mean | 22.2 | 21.7 | 23.4 | 25.3 | 27.4 | 32.5 | 24.2 |
Change in weight between starting age and recruitment (kg) | Mean | −10.8 | 1.0 | 7.2 | 12.1 | 17.0 | 28.7 | 7.5 |
Median | −8.7 | 1.4 | 7.0 | 12.0 | 17.0 | 26.0 | 5.9 | |
Rate of weight change between starting age and recruitment (kg/year) | Mean | −0.8 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 0.4 |
Median | −0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.3 | |
Ethnicity | ||||||||
White | % | 90.0 | 90.4 | 87.7 | 84.4 | 79.6 | 70.5 | 85.7 |
Black | % | 6.0 | 5.3 | 8.6 | 12.3 | 17.5 | 27.3 | 10.6 |
Asian | % | 1.9 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 2.0 |
Other | % | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
Continent of residence | ||||||||
North America | % | 63.2 | 57.4 | 53.2 | 51.6 | 55.0 | 65.6 | 56.6 |
Europe | % | 35.3 | 40.8 | 44.9 | 46.1 | 42.6 | 32.1 | 41.4 |
Australia | % | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.3 |
Asia | % | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.09 | 0.7 |
All participants | Total | 32,726 | 253,164 | 140,227 | 86,632 | 48,297 | 67,417 | 628,463 |
Frequency distributions for nonmissing values only.
Weight change was computed between earliest available weight and first weight available at or after recruitment, with the exception of a small number of subjects for whom weight change was computed from two retrospectively assessed weights before recruitment because weight at or after recruitment was not available.
Weight was retrospectively assessed at age 18 or 20 for the majority of studies.