Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 10;2(4):195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.01.007

Table 2.

Descriptive characteristics for CRPs that include people poststroke in regular CR classes

Characteristic CRPs that include stroke n = 74 n (%)
CRP stroke funding source n = 59
 Hospital/clinical center funding 31 (52.5)
 +Health insurance (1) foundation (1) research (1)
 Government funding/health insurance 21 (35.6)
 +User fee (7) hospital (2)
 User fee as sole method of funding 6 (10.2)
 Fundraising/foundation only 1 (1.7)
Eligibility criteria (n = 67)
 Diagnosis of stroke alone is sufficient 49 (73.1)
 Only those with coronary artery disease 17 (24.6)
 Must be living in the community (not long-term care) 32 (47.8)
 Not currently participating in active SR 15 (22.4)
 Have own transportation to facility and able to get to treatment area from front door (e.g., 100 m, 10-min walk) 5 (7.5)
 Able to function in group setting 5 (7.5)
 Able to get on/off equipment independently 5 (7.5)
 Not a significant falls risk 2 (3)
 Other, independent toileting (1) no significant pain (1), complete a 6MWT (1), exercise for 0.5 to 1 h with breaks (1) 4 (6)
Minimum days since stroke to be eligible (n = 68)
 Start any time after stroke 26 (38.2)
 Minimum 14 d 1 (1.5)
 Minimum 28-42 d 12 (17.6)
 Minimum 60-70 d 2 (2.9)
 When medically stable/referral from physician 13 (19)
 After completion of SR 10 (14.7)
 Other (ie, depends on the cardiac condition, discussed at team rounds, long wait-list) 4 (5.9)
Upper limit of time since stroke, beyond which the patient is not eligible (n = 67)
 No upper limit 57 (85.1)
 12 mo poststroke 4 (6.0)
 Other (unsure, based on physician referral, patient assessment [2], not specified [2]) 6 (9.0)
Exercise program delivery model for people poststroke (n = 66)
 Integrated into CR class/sessions only 55 (83.3)
 Offers both stroke class/sessions separate from cardiac and integrated into CR 10 (15.2)
 Only offers stroke class separate from cardiac classes 1 (1.5)
Model of supervision (n = 59)
 1:1 beginning then group-based 38 (64.4)
 Entirely group-based 20 (33.9)
 1:1 periodically with home-based exercise alone 1 (1.7)
Program model (n = 42)
 Hybrid program: combination of home-based exercise independent of rehabilitation staff and regular supervised facility-based exercise 29 (69)
 Option of home-based with periodic 1:1 sessions 8 (19.1)
 Supervised on-site sessions only 1 (2.4)
 Telemedicine option 3 (7.1)
 Supervised on-site sessions only 11 (26.2)
 Home-based with periodic 1:1 session alone 2 (4.8)
 Combined with web-based 1 (2.4)
Education specific to stroke, n = 61
 Yes 24 (39.3)
 No 36 (59)
 Sometimes 1 (1.6)
Proportion of people poststroke enrolled in CR program (n = 61)
 < 1% 10 (16.4)
 1%-2% 7 (11.5)
 3%-4% 17 (27.9)
 5%-10% 10 (16.4)
 > 10% 6 (9.8)
 I do not know 11 (18.0)
No. of people poststroke accepted in last calendar year (n = 62)
 1-10 35 (56.5)
 11-20 9 (14.5)
 21-50 4 (6.4)
 50-100 4 (6.4)
 > 100-200 4 (6.4)
 I do not know 6 (9.8)
Limit to No. of patients with stroke admitted (n = 61)
 No limit 54 (88.5)
 200 patients 2 (3.3)
 20 patients 1 (1.6)
 Other (availability space, personnel, 1/3 total volume, do not know) 4 (6.6)
No. of years accepting patients with stroke into program (n = 61)
 < 5 y 10 (16.4)
 5-10 y 11 (18.0)
 > 10 y 26 (42.6)
 I do not know 14 (23.0)
Wait-list of people poststroke (n = 61)
 No wait-list 31 (50.8)
 0-4 wk 10 (16.4)
 5-8 wk 14 (23.0)
 > 8 wk 4 (6.6)
 I do not know 2 (3.3)
No. of weekly classes available poststroke (n = 58)
 1 class/wk 10 (17.2)
 2-4 classes/wk 35 (60.3)
 5-9 classes/wk 8 (13.8)
 10-15 classes/wk 2 (3.4)
 > 15 classes/wk 3 (5.2)
RT prescribed poststroke (n = 61)
 Yes 50 (82)
 No 9 (14.8)
 Other, classroom instruction but no supervised training (1) not specified (1) 2 (3.3)
GXT and functional capacity tests (n = 59)
 GXT with ECG and BP for patients with and without mobility deficits 13 (22.0)
 GXT with ECG and BP only for patients with no mobility deficits 16 (27.1)
 GXT with ECG and BP only for patients with stroke in combination with cardiac conditions with or without mobility deficits 5 (8.5)
 No exercise stress tests conducted for CAD or stroke 17 (28.8)
 6WMT for stroke with mobility deficits 4 (6.8)
 6MWT alone or with DASI for any stroke 3 (5.1)
 ECG telemetry during 6MWT or during an exercise session for stroke with or without mobility deficits 2 (3.3)
 DASI alone 1 (1.7)
Method of determining resistance intensity poststroke (n = 60)
 Not prescribed 5 (8.3)
 1 repetition maximum (1RM) at least 9 (15)
 RPE 33 (55)
 Comfortable weight load alone 11 (18.3)
 Other (based on medical history and staff member determines resistance) 2 (3.3)
Method of determining aerobic exercise intensity poststroke (n = 62)
 RPE (in combination with most methods below) 56 (90.3)
 Based on results of GXT data 34 (54.8)
 Based on functional test (i.e., 6MWT) 27 (43.5)
 6MWT+GXT/6MWT+talk test 12 (19.4)/1 (1.6)
 Calculated age-adjusted target heart rate 13 (21)
 Estimated intensity based on clinical expertise 27 (43.5)
 Based on clinical expertise alone or with talk test or RPE 7 (11.3)
 Patient self-selected intensity 18 (29)
 Self-selected intensity alone 1 (1.6)

BP, blood pressure; CAD, coronary artery disease; CR, cardiac rehabilitation; CRP, cardiac rehabilitation program; DASI, Duke Activity Status Index (brief self-administered questionnaire to estimate functional capacity); ECG, electrocardiogram; GXT, graded exercise test; 1RM, 1 repetition maximum; RPE, rating of perceived exertion; RT, resistance training; 6MWT, 6-minute walk test; SR, stroke rehabilitation.

Program managers were instructed to choose all that apply.

Number based on responses for CRPs that include people poststroke in regular cardiac rehabilitation sessions only.