Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;2020:9247237. doi: 10.1155/2020/9247237

Table 2.

Logistic regression analyses of potential risk factors for ED in elderly men.

β SE Wals P OR 95% CI for OR
Lower Upper
Constant 9.617 2.519 14.576 <0.001
Age -0.151 0.061 6.132 0.013 0.860 0.763 0.969
BMI -0.077 0.044 3.016 0.082 0.926 0.848 1.010
Income/year
 >10,000 CNY -0.143 0.441 0.105 0.746 0.867 0.365 2.057
 ≤10,000 CNY 1.000
Education
 Primary school 1.000
 Middle school -0.139 0.465 0.089 0.766 0.871 0.350 2.167
 University -0.209 0.518 0.162 0.687 0.812 0.294 2.240
Diabetes
 Yes 1.000
 No -1.109 0.355 9.782 0.002 0.330 0.165 0.661
Regular intercourse
 Yes 1.000
 No 1.229 0.306 16.074 <0.001 3.416 1.874 6.229
Spouse age 0.029 0.056 0.269 0.604 1.029 0.923 1.147
TFI -0.098 0.035 7.944 0.005 0.906 0.846 0.970

Independent risks of ED were assessed by logistic regression analysis. ED: erectile dysfunction; BMI: body mass index; TFI: Tilburg Frailty Indicator.