Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 10;11:830. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00830

TABLE 2.

Parameters measured for each locus.

Ruppia spiralis
Ruppia hybrids
NA NE % miss HOBS HEXP GIS GST ρ DEST NA NE % miss HOBS HEXP GIS GST ρ DEST
RMB5° 10 1.8 68.8% 0.21 0.48 0.72 0.25 0.06 0.53 3 1.5 15.4% 0.00 0.55 1.00 0.39 0.46 0.57
RM26 14 4.3 3.0% 0.70 0.80 0.14 0.10 0.06 0.43 6 1.5 80.8% 0.50 0.80 0.01 0.34 0.35 1.00
RM12 9 2.7 3.3% 0.89 0.78 −0.30 0.02 0.08 0.05 3 2.0 33.7% 1.00 0.51 −0.98 −0.01 0.83 −0.02
RCS9 8 2.5 0.7% 0.75 0.61 −0.19 0.10 0.04 0.21 3 1.5 67.3% 1.00 0.69 −1.0 0.41 0.88 0.72
RUMR4 3 1.8 5.5% 0.79 0.62 −0.70 0.09 0.14 0.08 6 1.3 21.2% 0.26 0.60 −0.15 0.64 0.65 0.64
RMB15° 11 2.8 1.1% 0.72 0.64 −0.07 0.10 0.12 0.23 6 1.3 11.5% 0.06 0.60 0.75 0.59 0.64 0.63
RMB53° 3 1.3 93.7% 0.35 0.23 −0.54 / / / 2 1.0 1.9% 0.00 0.04 1.00 0.04 0.25 0.01
RM3 9 1.7 7.0% 0.55 0.52 −0.34 0.115 0.20 0.13 3 1.0 36.5% 0.00 0.46 1.00 0.95 0.78 0.01
RCS5 8 2.6 4.1% 0.70 0.72 −0.10 0.11 0.11 0.26 12 1.5 76.0% 1.00 0.87 −0.10 0.41 0.32 0.98
RM27 7 2.0 0.7% 0.99 0.52 −0.90 −0.02 0.01 −0.04 7 1.7 14.4% 0.74 0.67 −0.70 0.36 0.77 0.56
RCS8 8 1.9 1.5% 0.62 0.50 −0.22 0.13 0.09 0.16 6 1.3 22.1% 0.04 0.61 0.72 0.67 0.67 0.81
RC3 17 3.0 4.8% 0.79 0.76 −0.10 0.17 0.17 0.48 7 1.4 42.3% 0.50 0.77 −0.58 0.58 0.50 0.89
RM22 17 2.2 4.4% 0.59 0.57 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.23 / / / / / / / / /
Total 11.8 2.5 10.1% 0.66 0.59 −0.18 0.11 0.08 0.21 5 1.4 32.5% 0.40 0.50 −0.13 0.48 0.45 0.54

Ruppia maritima Ruppia hybrids

RMV22 2 1.1 3.4% 0.00 0.50 1.00 0.71 0.79 0.50 4 1.6 1.3% 0.29 0.46 0.19 0.63 0.61 0.43
RMV56 1 1.0 0.0% 0.00 0.00 / / / / 4 1.2 41.0% 0.17 0.60 0.33 0.69 0.52 0.71
RMB5° 2 1.1 1.1% 0.00 0.18 1.00 0.48 0.45 0.11 3 1.1 1.3% 0.00 0.55 1.00 0.80 0.45 0.64
RMB53° 1 1.0 0.0% 0.00 0.00 / / / / 2 1.0 0.0% 0.00 0.04 1.00 0.03 0.25 0.01
RMB55 1 1.0 9.1% 0.00 0.00 / / / / 13 1.6 0.0% 0.37 0.71 0.15 0.59 0.72 0.62
RMB15° 1 1.0 0.0% 0.00 0.00 / / / / 6 1.2 0.0% 0.11 0.44 0.77 0.59 0.64 0.63
RMV10 1 1.0 0.0% 0.00 0.00 / / / / 7 1.9 0.0% 0.32 0.60 0.41 0.23 0.42 0.20
RMB34 2 1.0 2.3% 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.60 5 1.8 26.9% 0.41 0.65 0.13 0.20 0.15 0.43
RMB12 1 1.0 3.4% 0.00 0.48 / / / / 7 1.7 37.2% 0.06 0.80 0.87 0.53 0.34 0.86
RMV20 1 1.0 13.6% 0.00 0.00 / / / / 8 1.3 3.8% 0.23 0.42 0.27 0.38 0.33 0.23
RMB16 1 1.0 9.1% 0.00 0.00 / / / / 5 1.3 24.4% 0.24 0.42 0.37 0.50 0.63 0.35
Total 1.3 1.0 5.4% 0.00 0.12 1.00 0.80 0.82 0.41 6.2 1.5 23.3% 0.22 0.58 0.39 0.55 0.47 0.50

Loci that are present in both sets of markers are indicated with°. NA, number of alleles; NE, number of effective alleles; % miss, percentage of failed amplifications; HOBS, observed heterozygosity; HEXP, expected heterozygosity; GIS, inbreeding coefficient; GST, fixation index; ρ, an index of population differentiation that is independent of the ploidy level and the rate of self-fertilization; DEST, another index of population differentiation, also independent of ploidy level, but it is calculated based on effective alleles instead of observed and expected heterozygosity.