Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2020 Apr 3;84(4):2004–2017. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28263

TABLE 3.

Linear mixed-effects model analysis of PDFF bias for five different 2D Cartesian sequential CSE-MRI acquisitions.

LFA-linear HFA-linear LFA-centric HFA-centric VFA-centric
Intercept 0.02±0.71
p = 1.00		 −0.75±0.88
p = 0.39		 0.15±0.71
p = 0.83		 0.12±0.68
p = 0.86		 0.21±0.71
p = 0.77
true PDFF −0.05±0.03
p = 0.10		 −0.17±0.04
** p < 0.01		 −0.04 ±0.03
p = 0.14		 −0.09 ±0.03
** p < 0.01		 −0.06±0.03
p = 0.05
T1,water
(×10−3)		 0.80±0.83
p = 0.34		 2.47±1.04
* p = 0.02		 0.66±0.83
p = 0.43		 1.10±0.80
p = 0.17		 0.56±0.83
p = 0.50
true PDFF· T1,water
(×10−3)		 0.06±0.03
p = 0.09		 0.30±0.04
** p < 0.01		 0.04 ±0.03
p = 0.23		 0.07±0.03
* p = 0.04		 0.06±0.03
p = 0.09
*

p<0.05

**

p<0.01.