Table 4.
Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of isolates from healthcare workers’ mobile phones in Grimad hospital, Anyigba.
| Pathogens | Total No. of isolates | No.(%) of isolates sensitive to | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN | AMC | COT | AMP | CPL | TE | CRO | CAZ | OFL | E | ||
| Gram positive | |||||||||||
| S. aureus | 14 | 10 (71.4) | 6 (42.8) | 0 | 0 | 9 (64.2) | 0 | 8 (57.1) | 4 (28.5) | 10 (71.4) | 8 (57.1) |
| S. epidermidis | 24 | 13 (54.1) | 4 (16.6) | 0 | 0 | 8 (33.3) | 0 | 8 (33.3) | 5 (20.8) | 8 (33.3) | 10 (41.6) |
| Streptococcus spp. | 8 | 4 (50.0) | 2 (25.0) | 0 | 0 | 2 (25.0) | 0 | 2 (25.0) | 1 (12.5) | 3 (37.5) | 5 (62.5) |
| Gram negative | |||||||||||
| Escherichia coli | 8 | 5 (62.5) | 3 (37.5) | 0 | 0 | 5 (37.5) | 0 | 6 (75.0) | 2 (25.0) | 4 (50.0) | NT |
| K. Pneumoniae | 4 | 2 (50.0) | 1 (25.0) | 0 | 0 | 2 (50.0) | 0 | 3 (75.0) | 0 | 2 (50.0) | NT |
| Acinetobacter spp. | 3 | 1 (33.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (33.3) | 0 | 1 (33.3) | 0 | 2 (66.6) | NT |
| Proteus spp. | 7 | 4 (57.1) | 3 (42.8) | 0 | 0 | 3 (42.8) | 0 | 1 (14.2) | 0 | 1 (14.2) | NT |
| P. aeruginosa | 11 | 6 (54.5) | 1 (7.0) | 0 | 0 | 4 (36.3) | 0 | 3 (27.2) | 0 | 5 (45.4) | NT |
CN, Gentamicin; AMC, amoxicillin/clavulanate; COT, Cotrimoxazole; CPL, Ciprofloxacin; , Ceftazidime; OFL, Ofloxacin; AMP, Ampicillin; TE, Tetracycline; CRO, Ceftriaxone; E, Erythromycin.
NT – Not Tested.