Table 5.
Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of isolates from non-healthcare workers’ mobile phones in Anyigba.
| Isolates | Total No. of isolates | No.(%) of isolates sensitive to | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN | AMP | AMC | CPL | TE | CRO | CAZ | E | COT | OFL | ||
| Gram positive | |||||||||||
| S. aureus | 8 | 7 (87.5) | 0 | 3 (37.5) | 5 (62.5) | 0 | 5 (62.5) | 1 (12.5) | 6 (75.0) | 0 | 6 (75.0) |
| S. epidermidis | 13 | 10 (76.9) | 3 (23.0) | 4 (30.7) | 8 (61.5) | 0 | 8 (61.5) | 6 (46.1) | 8 (61.5) | 0 | 10 (76.9) |
| Streptococcus spp. | 6 | 3 (50.0) | 2 (33.3) | 2 (33.3) | 3 (50.0) | 0 | 2 (33.3) | 1 (16.6) | 4 (66.6) | 1(16.6) | 1 (16.6) |
| Gram negative | |||||||||||
| Escherichia coli | 3 | 2 (66.6) | 0 | 1 (33.3) | 3 (66.6) | 0 | 3 (66.6) | 1 (33.3) | NT | 0 | 3 (66.6) |
| K. Pneumoniae | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | 0 | 1 (100) | 0 | 1 (100) | 0 | NT | 0 | 1 (100) |
| Proteus spp. | 2 | 1 (50.0) | 0 | 0 | 2 (100) | 0 | 2 (100) | 1 (50.0) | NT | 0 | 2 (100) |
| P. aeruginosa | 6 | 4 (66.6) | 0 | 0 | 3 (50.0) | 0 | 3 (50.0) | 0 | NT | 0 | 4 (66.6) |