Figure 7.
(A) Comparison of photonic efficiencies for hybrid samples and COF-42 with physisorbed [Co-1a] and [Co-1b]. (B) Comparison of the hydrogen evolution rate of [Co-1b]–COF containing 3.2 wt % [Co-1b] and COF-42 with 4.0 wt % physisorbed [Co-1b] and coarse-grained model fits of both systems. (C) Projection of the hydrogen evolution of [Co-1b]–COF containing 3.2 wt % [Co-1b] and COF-42 with 4.0 wt % physisorbed [Co-1b] based on the coarse-grained models.