Table 1.
Study | Mean accuracy (%) | Mean ITR (bits/min) | Classes | Population | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brouwer and van Erp (2010) | 68a | 3.71 | 6 | Healthy | Online |
van der Waal et al. (2012) | 67.0 | 7.8 | 36 | Healthy | Offline |
Thurlings et al. (2012a) | 78a | 6.52 | 6 | Healthy | Offline |
Ortner et al. (2012) | 68.1 | 3.36 | 8 | Healthy | Online |
Severens et al. (2013) | 77.0 | 1.2 | 2 | Healthy | Online |
Severens et al. (2014) | 60.0 | 6.6 | 36 | Healthy | Offline |
Severens et al. (2014) | 58.0 | 6.6 | 36 | ALS | Offline |
Kaufmann et al. (2014) | 85.8 | 2.54 | 4 | Healthy | Online |
Herweg et al. (2016) | 95.6 | 20.73 | 4 | Healthy | Online |
Halder et al. (2018) | 71.0 | 3.4 | 5 | Healthy | Offline |
Chabuda et al. (2019) | 76 | 0.51 | 2 | Healthy | Online |
Notes: a = approximation. When multiple variations of a paradigm were reported, those with the highest ITRs are included in this table. If numerical values were not reported, we provide approximations based on plots. Hybrid BCIs that used a combination of modalities are not included.