Table 3.
Coefficient of variation and intra-observer and inter-observer agreement for: mandibular body length (Go–Me) and mandibular body growth (ΔGo–Me) for both imaging methods; Mandibular symphyseal angle (GoR–Mê–GoL) and inter-gonial distance (GoR–GoL) for CBCT.
Coeff var | ICC | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | 95% IC lower | 95% IC upper | P valueb | Intra-observer (Obs. I; Obs. II) | Interobservera | |
Go–Me R T1 | ||||||
CBCT | 0.098 ± 0.005 | 0.085 | 0.111 | 0.314 | 0.995; 0.989 | 0.984 |
RLC | 0.120 ± 0.011 | 0.093 | 0.148 | 0.988; 0.982 | 0.963 | |
Go–Me R T2 | ||||||
CBCT | 0.094 ± 0.007 | 0.076 | 0.111 | 0.427 | 0.995; 0.997 | 0.981 |
RLC | 0.118 ± 0.017 | 0.076 | 0.160 | 0.995; 0.989 | 0.956 | |
Go–Me L T1 | ||||||
CBCT | 0.091 ± 0.006 | 0.077 | 0.104 | 0.201 | 0.994; 0.991 | 0.986 |
RLC | 0.116 ± 0.011 | 0.089 | 0.142 | 0.988; 0.975 | 0.967 | |
Go–MeL T2 | ||||||
CBCT | 0.089 ± 0.006 | 0.073 | 0.105 | 0.428 | 0.992; 0.996 | 0.982 |
RLC | 0.121 ± 0.014 | 0.087 | 0.156 | 0.991; 0.984 | 0.964 | |
Δ Go–Me L growth | ||||||
CBCT | 0.428 ± 0.011 | 0.362 | 0.414 | 0.593 | 0.966; 0.972 | 0.918 |
RLC | 0.524 ± 0.089 | 0.303 | 0.745 | 0.951; 0.924 | 0.875 | |
Δ Go–Me R growth | ||||||
CBCT | 0.488 ± 0.044 | 0.378 | 0.598 | 0.965 | 0.955; 0.965 | 0.957 |
RLC | 0.451 ± 0.046 | 0.337 | 0.566 | 0.956; 0.938 | 0.887 | |
GoR–Mê–GoL T1 | ||||||
CBCT | 0.092 ± 0.005 | 0.079 | 0.106 | 0.966; 0.953 | 0.984 | |
GoR–Mê–GoL T2 | ||||||
CBCT | 0.101 ± 0.007 | 0.084 | 0.118 | 0.992; 0.974 | 0.988 | |
GoR–GoL T1 | ||||||
CBCT | 0.096 ± 0.004 | 0.081 | 0.109 | 0.952; 0.967 | 0.981 | |
GoR–GoL T2 | ||||||
CBCT | 0.099 ± 0.006 | 0.084 | 0.111 | 0.987; 0.947 | 0.979 |
CBCT cone-beam computed tomography, RLC reconstructed lateral cephalogram, Coeff Var coefficient of variation, ICC intraclass correlation coefficient, Obs observer, MBL mandibular body length.
a nter-observer ICC data are given as the means of measurements at two time points and by two investigators.
bTwo-sample test for coefficient of variation.