Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 17;130:104549. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104549

Table 2.

Positivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of examined SARS-CoV-2 serology assays.

specificity
positivity
NPV
PPV
(n = 320) 1−10 d (n = 37) > 10 d (n = 38) prevalence 0.8 %
1−10 d > 10 d 1−10 d > 10 d
% 95 % CI % 95 % CI % 95 % CI % % % %
Euroimmun
99.1 (97.3−99.7) 27.0 (15.4−43.0) 70.3 (54.2−82.5) 99.4 99.8 19.5 38.6
Diasorin
99.1 (97.3−99.7) 29.7 (17.5−45.8) 68.4 (52.5−80.9) 99.4 99.7 21.0 38.0
Roche
99.7 (98.3−100) 46.0 (31.0−61.6) 79.0 (63.7−88.9) 99.6 99.8 55.3 68.0
Wantai
99.4 (97.8−100) 73.0 (57.0−84.6) 81.6 (66.6−90.8) 99.8 99.9 49.5 52.3
Siemens
100 (98.8−100) 35.1 (21.8−51.2) 73.7 (58.0−85.0) 99.5 99.8 100 100

To determine positivity rates and specificity, samples from SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive patients (n = 75) collected in March and April of 2020 and samples from pre-pandemic blood donations made in March of 2017 (n = 320) were tested with each assay. NPV and PPV were calculated for a prevalence of 0.8 % according to our local currently low prevalence setting (Hamburg, Germany). Patients were grouped according to the time between onset of symptoms and date of blood sampling in days (1−10 days and >10 days).

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; d, days; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.