Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 15;48(13):7502–7519. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa497

Table 4.

Equilibrium binding of wt RNAs and their variants with mutations in the A-rich motifs to the ProQ NTD and the Hfq protein

K d [nM]
32P-RNA NTDa Hfqb
malM-3′ 12 ± 4.8c 22 ± 7
malM-3′-AtoU 5.0 ± 1.8 2.2 ± 0.8
cspE-3′ 4.5 ± 1.5c 5.9 ± 2.5
cspE-3′-AtoU 100 ± 51 1.7 ± 0.88
cspE81-3′ 7.6 ± 4.5 47 ± 11
cspE81-3′-AtoU 17 ± 4.6 2.6 ± 1.2
cspA-3′ 33 ± 10d 49 ± 15d
cspA-3′-RtoU 42 ± 18d 1.3 ± 0.66
hupB-3′ 18 ± 1.7 30 ± 16d
hupB-3′-RtoU 29 ± 7.2 1.9 ± 0.75
infA-3′ 19 ± 10 28 ± 12d
infA-3′-AtoU 32 ± 13 1.2 ± 0.55

The Kd values were obtained by fitting the data to the quadratic equation. The average Kd values with standard deviations were calculated from three to five independent experiments, except for malM-3′ binding to the NTD (eleven replicates) and Hfq (six replicates) and cspE-3′ binding to the NTD (seven replicates) and Hfq (seven replicates).

aThe RNA binding to the NTD was measured using gelshift assay

bThe RNA binding to the Hfq protein was measured using double-filter retention assay

cData from Table 1.

dThe endpoint value of 100% was assumed in the data fitting.